11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Drug Design, Development and Therapy (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on the design and development of drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes, patient safety, and programs targeted at the effective and safe use of medicines. Sign up for email alerts here.

      88,007 Monthly downloads/views I 4.319 Impact Factor I 6.6 CiteScore I 1.12 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.784 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

       

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin.

          Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews.

          Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC t) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups.

          Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications, adherence, and clinical outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort study

          Background The majority of people with hypertension require more than one medication to achieve blood pressure control. Many patients are prescribed multipill antihypertensive regimens rather than single-pill fixed-dose combination (FDC) treatment. Although FDC use may improve medication adherence, the impact on patient outcomes is unclear. We compared clinical outcomes and medication adherence with FDC therapy versus multipill combination therapy in a real-world setting using linked clinical and administrative databases. Methods and findings We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 13,350 individuals 66 years and older in Ontario, Canada with up to 5 years of follow-up. We included individuals who were newly initiated on one angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB) plus one thiazide diuretic. High-dimensional propensity score matching was used to compare individuals receiving FDC versus multipill therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, or stroke. We conducted 2 analyses to examine the association between adherence and patient outcomes. First, we performed an on-treatment analysis to determine whether outcomes differed between groups while patients were on treatment, censoring patients when they first discontinued treatment, defined as not receiving medications within 150% of the previous days’ supply. Second, we conducted an intention-to-treat analysis that followed individuals allowing for breaks in treatment to quantify the difference in drug adherence between groups and assess its impact on clinical outcomes. As expected, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups in the on-treatment analysis (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86–1.31, P = 0.60). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of total follow-up days covered with medications was significantly greater in the FDC group (70%; IQR 19–98) than in the multipill group (42%, IQR 11–91, P < 0.01), and the primary outcome was less frequent in FDC recipients (3.4 versus 3.9 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97, P < 0.01). The main limitations of this study were the lack of data regarding cause of death and blood pressure measurements and the possibility of residual confounding. Conclusions Among older adults initiating combination antihypertensive treatment, FDC therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of composite clinical outcomes, which may be related to better medication adherence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia and associated cardiovascular disease.

            To estimate the prevalence of concurrent hypertension and dyslipidemia among a general veteran population and separately among patients with diabetes mellitus, and to compare the prevalence of cardiovascular disease among groups with isolated versus concurrent hypertension and dyslipidemia. Retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted in 6 medical centers of the Department of Veterans Affairs and included 371221 patients seen for any reason from October 1, 1998, to September 30, 2001. The proportion of patients with isolated or concurrent hypertension and dyslipidemia was estimated based on diagnostic, pharmacy, laboratory, and vital sign information, and the age-adjusted proportions of individuals with cardiovascular disease were compared between groups. We found that 57.8% of all patients had hypertension or dyslipidemia; 30.7% had both. Sixteen percent of all patients had diabetes mellitus, and 66.3% of these patients had concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was often more than doubled among patients with concomitant conditions compared with patients with either condition alone. The prevalence of stroke and peripheral arterial disease similarly increased among patients with both conditions. The prevalence of these cardiovascular diseases was highest among patients with diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease was high among this population of older, predominately male US veterans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetics of CS-866, a new angiotensin II receptor blocker, in healthy subjects.

              CS-866, a novel angiotensin II receptor blocker, is rapidly and completely metabolized to RNH-6270, its active metabolite. The pharmacokinetics of RNH-6270 following oral CS-866 or intravenous RNH-6270 administration was determined in 104 healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of RNH-6270 was linear over dose ranges of 1 to 32 mg (intravenous RNH-6270 administration) and 10 to 160 mg (oral CS-866 administration). The time to maximum plasma concentration of RNH-6270 after oral CS-866 administration ranged from 1.4 to 2.8 hours, and the terminal elimination half-life ranged from 12 to 18 hours. Absolute bioavailability of RNH-6270 after oral administration of CS-866 was 26%. Administration of CS-866 once daily for 10 days did not result in drug accumulation. When administered intravenously, RNH-6270 has a volume of distribution of 15 to 25 L. Approximately 35% to 50% of RNH-6270 is excreted unchanged in the urine. CS-866 was safe and well tolerated at doses of up to 160 mg/day.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                DDDT
                dddt
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove
                1177-8881
                03 April 2019
                2019
                : 13
                : 991-997
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology and PharmacoGenomics Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine , Busan, Republic of Korea
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital , Busan, Republic of Korea
                [3 ]Formulation Research Team , Daewoong Pharma, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [4 ]Clinical Research Team, Daewoong Pharma , Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jong-Lyul GhimDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Inje University College of Medicine and Busan Paik Hospital , 75 Bokji-ro, Busanjin-Gu, Busan47392, Republic of KoreaTel +82 105 639 3635Fax +82 51 893 1232Email jonglyul.ghim@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                202730
                10.2147/DDDT.S202730
                6497490
                a2653eab-746d-4920-9e73-b1fa38225a78
                © 2019 Oh et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 23 January 2019
                : 06 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, References: 19, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                fixed-dose combination,pharmacokinetics,amlodipine,olmesartan,rosuvastatin

                Comments

                Comment on this article