10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A new maximal bicycle test using a prediction algorithm developed from four large COPD studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background: Maximum exercise workload (W MAX) is today assessed as the first part of Cardiopulmonary Exercise testing. The W MAX test exposes patients with COPD, often having cardiovascular comorbidity, to risks. Our research project was initiated with the final aim to eliminate the W MAX test and replace this test with a predicted value of W MAX, based on a prediction algorithm of W MAX derived from multicentre studies.

          Methods: Baseline data (W MAX, demography, lung function parameters) from 850 COPD patients from four multicentre studies were collected and standardized. A prediction algorithm was prepared using Random Forest modelling. Predicted values of W MAX were used in a new W MAX test, which used a linear increase in order to reach the predicted W MAX within 8 min. The new W MAX test was compared with the standard stepwise W MAX test in a pilot study including 15 patients with mild/moderate COPD.

          Results: The best prediction algorithm of W MAX included age, sex, height, weight, and six lung function parameters. FEV 1 and DLCO were the most important predictors. The new W MAX test had a better correlation (R 2 = 0.84) between predicted and measured W MAX than the standard W MAX test (R 2 = 0.66), with slopes of 0.50 and 0.46, respectively. The results from the new W MAX test and the standard W MAX test correlated well.

          Conclusion: A prediction algorithm based on data from four large multicentre studies was used in a new W MAX test. The prediction algorithm provided reliable values of predicted W MAX. In comparison with the standard W MAX test, the new W MAX test provided similar overall results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

            , (2003)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

              G Borg (1982)
              There is a great demand for perceptual effort ratings in order to better understand man at work. Such ratings are important complements to behavioral and physiological measurements of physical performance and work capacity. This is true for both theoretical analysis and application in medicine, human factors, and sports. Perceptual estimates, obtained by psychophysical ratio-scaling methods, are valid when describing general perceptual variation, but category methods are more useful in several applied situations when differences between individuals are described. A presentation is made of ratio-scaling methods, category methods, especially the Borg Scale for ratings of perceived exertion, and a new method that combines the category method with ratio properties. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed in both theoretical-psychophysical and psychophysiological frames of reference.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Clin Respir J
                Eur Clin Respir J
                European Clinical Respiratory Journal
                Taylor & Francis
                2001-8525
                20 November 2019
                2020
                : 7
                : 1
                : 1692645
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Clinical Sciences, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital; , Lund, Sweden
                [b ]Regional Cancer Centre South, Region Skane; , Lund, Sweden
                Author notes
                CONTACT Göran Eriksson, goran.eriksson@ 123456med.lu.se Department of Clinical Sciences, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital; , Lund22185, Sweden
                Article
                1692645
                10.1080/20018525.2019.1692645
                6882496
                31839909
                a26e4b13-df70-429e-9708-42699812e2dc
                © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, References: 35, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article

                copd,cardiopulmonary exercise testing,wmax,random forest,prediction

                Comments

                Comment on this article