7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Spanish Consensus on the Use of Safinamide for Parkinson’s Disease in Clinical Practice

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Safinamide is an approved drug for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Scarce data are available on its use in clinical practice. A group of Spanish movement disorders specialists was convened to review the use of safinamide across different clinical scenarios that may guide neurologists in clinical practice. Eight specialists with recognized expertise in PD management elaborated the statements based on available evidence in the literature and on their clinical experience. The RAND/UCLA method was carried, with final conclusions accepted after a 2-round modified Delphi process. Higher level of agreement between panellists was reached for the following statements. Safinamide significantly improves mean daily OFF time without troublesome dyskinesias. Adjunctive treatment with safinamide is associated with motor improvements in patients with mid-to-late PD. The efficacy of safinamide on motor fluctuations is maintained at long-term, with no increase over time in dyskinesias severity. The clinical benefits of safinamide on pain and depression remain unclear. Safinamide presents a similar incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. The efficacy and safety of safinamide shown in the pivotal clinical trials are reproduced in clinical practice, with improvement of parkinsonian symptoms, decrease of daily OFF time, control of dyskinesias at the long term, and good tolerability and safety.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Long-Term Effects of Safinamide on Mood Fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease

          Background: Mood disorders are very frequent in Parkinson’s Disease (PD), and their effective treatment is still a major unresolved issue: growing evidence suggests that glutamatergic system dysfunction is directly involved. Safinamide is a drug with an innovative mechanism of action, dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic, that includes the reversible inhibition of the monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) enzyme and the modulation of excessive glutamate release through the use- and state-dependent blockade of the sodium channels. Objective: To investigate the effects of safinamide on mood over two-year treatment in PD patients with motor fluctuations. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the data from studies 016 and 018. The analysis focused on outcomes related to mood, namely: scores of the “Emotional well-being” domain of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), scores of the GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (GRID-HAMD) and the proportion of patients reporting depression as an adverse event over the entire treatment period. Results: Safinamide, compared to placebo, significantly improved the PDQ-39 “Emotional well-being” domain after6-months (p = 0.0067) and 2 years (p = 0.0006), as well as the GRID-HAMD (p = 0.0408 after 6 months and p = 0.0027 after 2 years). Significantly fewer patients in the safinamide group, compared to placebo, experienced depression as adverse event (p = 0.0444 after 6 months and p = 0.0057 after 2 years). Conclusion: The favorable effect of safinamide on mood may be explained by the improvement in wearing off and by its modulation of glutamatergic hyperactivity and reversible MAO-B inhibition. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate this potential benefit.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combination therapy with monoamine oxidase inhibitors and other antidepressants or stimulants: strategies for the management of treatment-resistant depression.

            Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major health concern. More than 40% of patients treated for major depressive disorder with an appropriate antidepressant dose for an adequate duration fail to respond. Further, approximately half of adults with major depressive disorder fail to achieve sustained remission despite various medication trials. The utilization of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for the treatment of depression in clinical practice today is low due to their widely known adverse effects, some of which may be life threatening, and the risk for dietary and drug interactions. For these reasons, MAOIs are not recommended to be prescribed along with other antidepressants or certain prescription or nonprescription drugs. Pharmacologic options are limited for individuals with TRD, however, and there is a paucity of data on the efficacy of MAOIs in combination with other antidepressants for the management of TRD. We performed a search of the PubMed database (inception through January 25, 2015) to identify cases that illustrate the potential utility, as well as risks, of combination treatment with MAOIs and other antidepressants for the management of TRD; 18 articles met the criteria for our search. In addition, we performed a retrospective case series by reviewing the medical records of 29 adults treated for depression with an MAOI plus another psychotropic agent (an antidepressant or stimulant medication) between 2003 and 2012 at a large Midwestern teaching hospital. We compared the findings of the published experience with our local experience to allow for more informed decisions regarding pharmacotherapy in patients with TRD. We separated the local experience into two groups: 15 cases with the selective MAO type B inhibitor selegiline combined with medications presumed to increase the risk of serotonin syndrome and 14 cases with nonselective MAOIs (phenelzine and tranylcypromine) combined with other contraindicated medications. Although risks of combination treatment certainly exist with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or clomipramine, the current literature supports cautious use of combining MAOIs with other antidepressants in patients with TRD who have failed multiple treatment modalities. In addition, the data from the 29 patients receiving combination therapy with an MAOI and another antidepressant or stimulant medication revealed that 21% improved significantly, with no complications. This case series and literature review suggest that when used under close supervision and under the care of an experienced clinician in psychiatry, combination therapy may be a consideration for the management of TRD in patients not responding to monotherapy or other combinations of antidepressants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term Efficacy of Safinamide on Parkinson’s Disease Chronic Pain

              Introduction Chronic pain is an important yet overlooked non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD), caused by an imbalance of the dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. Safinamide has a multimodal mechanism of action, dopaminergic (reversible MAO-B inhibition) and non-dopaminergic (modulation of the abnormal glutamate release), that might be beneficial for both motor and non-motor symptoms. Objectives To investigate the long-term (2-year) efficacy of safinamide on PD chronic pain and to confirm the positive effects observed after 6 months of treatment. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the data from the 2-year study 018, focused on the reduction of concomitant pain treatments and on the scores of pain-related items of the Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQ-39). Results Safinamide, compared with placebo, significantly improved the PDQ-39 items 37 (“painful cramps or spasm,” p = 0.0074) and 39 (“unpleasantly hot or cold,” p = 0.0209) and significantly reduced the number of concomitant pain treatments by 26.2% (p = 0.005). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the safinamide group was not using pain drugs after 2 years of treatment (p = 0.0478). Conclusions The positive effects of safinamide on PD chronic pain were maintained in the long term. Further investigations are desirable to confirm their clinical relevance. Funding Zambon SpA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain Sci
                Brain Sci
                brainsci
                Brain Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-3425
                18 March 2020
                March 2020
                : 10
                : 3
                : 176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; jkulisevsky@ 123456santpau.cat
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]Centro de Investigación en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), 28031 Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario San Roque, 35001 Las Palmas, Spain; jmarbelo@ 123456gmail.com
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Universidad Fernando Pessoa-Canarias, 35450 Las Palmas, Spain
                [6 ]Movement Disorders Unit-CSUR, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain; francisco.grandas@ 123456salud.madrid.org
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [8 ]Movement Disorders Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), 31008 Pamplona, Spain; rluquin@ 123456unav.es
                [9 ]Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
                [10 ]Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; pmm650@ 123456hotmail.com
                [11 ]Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), 28031 Madrid, Spain
                [12 ]Neurology and Neuroscience Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CUN), 31008Pamplona, Spain; mcroroz@ 123456unav.es
                [13 ]Centre for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
                [14 ]Neurosciences Institut, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; FVALLDE@ 123456clinic.ub.es
                [15 ]Department of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
                [16 ]Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), 08041 Barcelona, Spain
                [17 ]Department of Medicine, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: JPagonabarraga@ 123456santpau.cat ; Tel.: +34-647-618-844; Fax: +34-935-565-748
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8148-8807
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-5280
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4870-1431
                Article
                brainsci-10-00176
                10.3390/brainsci10030176
                7139287
                32197462
                a277150b-6881-49e6-8443-6db26e67a7ad
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 February 2020
                : 16 March 2020
                Categories
                Review

                safinamide,efficacy,safety,fluctuations,dyskinesia,rand/ucla appropriateness method

                Comments

                Comment on this article