4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Factor Analysis of the Childcare Food and Activity Practices Questionnaire (CFAPQ) among Staff Members in Maryland Childcare Centers

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Parental feeding behaviors influence the development of children's dietary behaviors. Less is known about the influence of feeding behaviors used by childcare staff. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the feeding-related subscales of the Childcare Food and Activity Practices Questionnaire (CFAPQ), a scale developed and validated in the Netherlands, for use among staff members caring for 3–5 year olds in 46 childcare centers across Maryland.

          Methods

          A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed with childcare staff ( n = 136) to evaluate the goodness of fit of the original 7-factor, 40-item structure of the CFAPQ feeding-related subscales. Because the original factor structure was not confirmed, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify an alternative underlying factor structure. Pearson correlations between subscales were examined to identify if the factors related to one another in theoretically expected ways.

          Results

          The 7-factor, 40-item structure of the original CFAPQ was not confirmed by the CFA (Model fit: RMSEA = 0.14, CFI = 0.72, TLI = 0.69, and SRMR = 0.18). A revised 4-factor model with 22 items was confirmed (Model fit: RMSEA = 0.079, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.96, and SRMR = 0.09). The internal consistency of factors in the revised model was moderate to good (Cronbach's α = 0.63–0.81). The 4 factors include: 1) Responsive (8-items; staff encouragement surrounding healthy food intake); 2) Controlling (5-items; staff applying food related pressure or restriction); 3) Indulgent (5-items; staff using foods as reward or to regulate the child's emotional state); and 4) High engagement (4-items; staff involvement in children's snacks and meals). Correlations between factors indicated convergent and discriminant validity in theoretically expected directions. Indulgent was significantly negatively related to responsive ( r = −0.39, P < 0.01). Controlling was significantly positively related to high engagement ( r = 0.22, P < 0.01).

          Conclusions

          Among this sample of childcare staff, a 4-factor, 22-item structure was a better fit than the original 7-factor, 40-item structure of the CFAPQ feeding subscales. Robust psychometric properties ensure that scales are measuring what they claim.

          Funding Sources

          National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Curr Dev Nutr
          Curr Dev Nutr
          cdn
          Current Developments in Nutrition
          Oxford University Press
          2475-2991
          June 2020
          29 May 2020
          : 4
          : Suppl 2 , NUTRITION 2020 LIVE ONLINE Abstracts
          : 940
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
          [2 ] University of Maryland School of Medicine, Fellow, RTI International
          Article
          PMC7258569 PMC7258569 7258569 nzaa054_012
          10.1093/cdn/nzaa054_012
          7258569
          a28272ba-2ea6-4471-8fff-c826999fbdd4
          Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          Categories
          Maternal, Perinatal and Pediatric Nutrition
          AcademicSubjects/MED00060

          Comments

          Comment on this article