7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A National Evaluation of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Aim

          To conduct a comprehensive review of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula leading to registration in Ireland.

          Design

          A mixed methods approach using a curriculum evaluation framework that was underpinned by the philosophy and principles of appreciative inquiry.

          Methods

          Five separate workstreams completed an evaluation of national policy documents and international curriculum documents, a literature review and two phases of stakeholder engagement including a graduate survey and peer‐grouped stakeholder focus groups. The workstreams were emulated for the professions of nursing and midwifery.

          Results

          National policy indicates a significant shift in healthcare delivery to the community environment, with a strong focus on the social determinants of health and a flexible interprofessional workforce. International curricula review revealed that nursing and midwifery education was split equally between academia and clinical practice at bachelor's degree level. Graduates were assessed for clinical competence with a variance of four to seven domains of competence evident for nurses and five principles for midwives. Direct entry midwifery was not widely available. The graduate survey identified that students were satisfied with the academic components of the curriculum; however, significant challenges in clinical placement were reported. Stakeholder focus groups reported a need for a learner‐focused approach to the curricula, increased access to education, a deeper understanding and appreciation of the various roles required to educate nurses and midwives and a recognition of midwifery as a separate profession.

          Conclusion

          There is a need for a significant revision of the current nursing and midwifery curricula to meet the future healthcare needs of the diverse patient population with a community‐focused delivery.

          Reporting Method

          The good reporting of a mixed methods study was used to guide the development of this manuscript.

          Patient or Public Contribution

          An Expert Advisory Group (EAG) was appointed to oversee the conduct of the research project and advise the research team as requested. There were five service user representatives included in the membership of the EAG. This included one representative from each of the divisions of the nursing and midwifery register in Ireland. A separate stakeholder engagement focus group was also conducted for the research upon the request from the service users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Content Analysis : An Introduction to Its Methodology

            What matters in people’s social lives? What motivates and inspires our society? How do we enact what we know? Since the first edition published in 1980, Content Analysis has helped shape and define the field. In the highly anticipated Fourth Edition, award-winning scholar and author Klaus Krippendorff introduces you to the most current method of analyzing the textual fabric of contemporary society. Students and scholars will learn to treat data not as physical events but as communications that are created and disseminated to be seen, read, interpreted, enacted, and reflected upon according to the meanings they have for their recipients. Interpreting communications as texts in the contexts of their social uses distinguishes content analysis from other empirical methods of inquiry. Organized into three parts, Content Analysis first examines the conceptual aspects of content analysis, then discusses components such as unitizing and sampling, and concludes by showing readers how to trace the analytical paths and apply evaluative techniques. The Fourth Edition has been completely revised to offer you the most current techniques and research on content analysis, including new information on reliability and social media. You will also gain practical advice and experience for teaching academic and commercial researchers how to conduct content analysis.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach

              Abstract Document analysis is one of the most commonly used and powerful methods in health policy research. While existing qualitative research manuals offer direction for conducting document analysis, there has been little specific discussion about how to use this method to understand and analyse health policy. Drawing on guidance from other disciplines and our own research experience, we present a systematic approach for document analysis in health policy research called the READ approach: (1) ready your materials, (2) extract data, (3) analyse data and (4) distil your findings. We provide practical advice on each step, with consideration of epistemological and theoretical issues such as the socially constructed nature of documents and their role in modern bureaucracies. We provide examples of document analysis from two case studies from our work in Pakistan and Niger in which documents provided critical insight and advanced empirical and theoretical understanding of a health policy issue. Coding tools for each case study are included as Supplementary Files to inspire and guide future research. These case studies illustrate the value of rigorous document analysis to understand policy content and processes and discourse around policy, in ways that are either not possible using other methods, or greatly enrich other methods such as in-depth interviews and observation. Given the central nature of documents to health policy research and importance of reading them critically, the READ approach provides practical guidance on gaining the most out of documents and ensuring rigour in document analysis.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mary.ryder@ucd.ie
                Journal
                J Adv Nurs
                J Adv Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648
                JAN
                Journal of Advanced Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0309-2402
                1365-2648
                05 September 2024
                April 2025
                : 81
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/jan.v81.4 )
                : 2072-2086
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
                [ 2 ] Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services Dublin Ireland
                [ 3 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery Notre Dame University Fremantle Western Australia Australia
                [ 4 ] Faculty of Science and Health Technology University of Shannon Athlone Ireland
                [ 5 ] Atlantic Technology University, Mayo Campus Castlebar Mayo Ireland
                [ 6 ] St John of God Community Services Dunleer Louth Ireland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence:

                Mary Ryder ( mary.ryder@ 123456ucd.ie )

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-4941
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-629X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-1803
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-2620
                Article
                JAN16430
                10.1111/jan.16430
                11896926
                39235133
                a2981724-6415-463e-9102-208216318ccf
                © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 20 June 2024
                : 18 April 2024
                : 14 August 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 15, Words: 10500
                Funding
                Funded by: The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland
                Award ID: RFT 212720
                Categories
                Empirical Research Mixed Methods
                Research Article
                Empirical Research Mixed Methods
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2025
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.4 mode:remove_FC converted:11.03.2025

                Nursing
                documentation,evaluation research,focus groups,midwifery,mixed method design,nurse education,survey designs

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log