14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measurement of lean body mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a consideration of the pros and cons.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The assessment of body composition has important applications in the evaluation of nutritional status and estimating potential health risks. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a valid method for the assessment of body composition. BIA is an alternative to more invasive and expensive methods like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is an easy-to-use and low-cost method for the estimation of fat-free mass (FFM) in physiological and pathological conditions. The reliability of BIA measurements is influenced by various factors related to the instrument itself, including electrodes, operator, subject, and environment. BIA assumptions beyond its use for body composition are the human body is empirically composed of cylinders, FFM contains virtually all the water and conducting electrolytes in the body, and its hydration is constant. FFM can be predicted by BIA through equations developed using reference methods. Several BIA prediction equations exist for the estimation of FFM, skeletal muscle mass (SMM), or appendicular SMM. The BIA prediction models differ according to the characteristics of the sample in which they have been derived and validated in addition to the parameters included in the multiple regression analysis. In choosing BIA equations, it is important to consider the characteristics of the sample in which it has been developed and validated, since, for example, age- and ethnicity-related differences could sensitively affect BIA estimates.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Aging Clin Exp Res
          Aging clinical and experimental research
          Springer Nature
          1720-8319
          1594-0667
          Aug 2017
          : 29
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
          [2 ] Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. marinaderui@gmail.com.
          [3 ] Clinica Geriatrica, Ospedale Giustinianeo, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. marinaderui@gmail.com.
          [4 ] Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
          [5 ] Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
          [6 ] National Research Council, Aging Branch, Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.
          Article
          10.1007/s40520-016-0622-6
          10.1007/s40520-016-0622-6
          27568020
          a2a5e4d1-7829-4ee7-85cd-3be8849d8775
          History

          Body composition,Prediction equations,Elderly,Bioelectrical impedance analysis

          Comments

          Comment on this article