For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
21
views
15
references
 Top references
cited by
3
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      356
      similar
       All similar

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services across different scales and domains in Europe

      Author(s): , , ,
      Publication date Created:
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: One Ecosystem
      Publisher: Pensoft Publishers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment

          Berta Martín-López, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Marina García-Llorente … (2014)
          Article 0 comments Cited 103 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: found

            Mapping Ecosystem Services

            Benjamin Burkhard, Joachim Maes (2017)
            Book 0 comments Cited 59 times – based on 0 reviews
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review

              Matthias Schröter, Christian Albert, Alexandra P. Marques … (2016)
              Abstract National ecosystem assessments form an essential knowledge base for safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. We analyze eight European (sub-)national ecosystem assessments (Portugal, United Kingdom, Spain, Norway, Flanders, Netherlands, Finland, and Germany) and compare their objectives, political context, methods, and operationalization. We observed remarkable differences in breadth of the assessment, methods employed, variety of services considered, policy mandates, and funding mechanisms. Biodiversity and ecosystem services are mainly assessed independently, with biodiversity conceptualized as underpinning services, as a source of conflict with services, or as a service in itself. Recommendations derived from our analysis for future ecosystem assessments include the needs to improve the common evidence base, to advance the mapping of services, to consider international flows of services, and to connect more strongly to policy questions. Although the context specificity of national ecosystem assessments is acknowledged as important, a greater harmonization across assessments could help to better inform common European policies and future pan-regional assessments.
              Article 0 comments Cited 32 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: One Ecosystem
                Abbreviated Title: OE
                Publisher: Pensoft Publishers
                ISSN (Electronic): 2367-8194
                Publication date Created: October 03 2018
                Publication date (Electronic): October 03 2018
                Volume: 3
                Article
                DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288
                SO-VID: a2f8ff0e-154c-44e8-81d5-cad2fb7a3ddd
                Copyright © © 2018
                License:

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content356

                See all similar

                Cited by3

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors154

                See all reference authors