3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Interfacial alteration of pyrite caused by bioleaching

      , , , , , ,
      Hydrometallurgy
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bioleaching review part A: progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation.

          Bioleaching of metal sulfides is caused by astonishingly diverse groups of bacteria. Today, at least 11 putative prokaryotic divisions can be related to this phenomenon. In contrast, the dissolution (bio)chemistry of metal sulfides follows only two pathways, which are determined by the acid-solubility of the sulfides: the thiosulfate and the polysulfide pathway. The bacterial cell can effect this sulfide dissolution by "contact" and "non-contact" mechanisms. The non-contact mechanism assumes that the bacteria oxidize only dissolved iron(II) ions to iron(III) ions. The latter can then attack metal sulfides and be reduced to iron(II) ions. The contact mechanism requires attachment of bacteria to the sulfide surface. The primary mechanism for attachment to pyrite is electrostatic in nature. In the case of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, bacterial exopolymers contain iron(III) ions, each complexed by two uronic acid residues. The resulting positive charge allows attachment to the negatively charged pyrite. Thus, the first function of complexed iron(III) ions in the contact mechanism is mediation of cell attachment, while their second function is oxidative dissolution of the metal sulfide, similar to the role of free iron(III) ions in the non-contact mechanism. In both cases, the electrons extracted from the metal sulfide reduce molecular oxygen via a complex redox chain located below the outer membrane, the periplasmic space, and the cytoplasmic membrane of leaching bacteria. The dominance of either At. ferrooxidans or Leptospirillum ferrooxidans in mesophilic leaching habitats is highly likely to result from differences in their biochemical iron(II) oxidation pathways, especially the involvement of rusticyanin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Distribution of thiobacillus ferrooxidans and leptospirillum ferrooxidans: implications for generation of acid mine drainage

              Although Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans are widely considered to be the microorganisms that control the rate of generation of acid mine drainage, little is known about their natural distribution and abundance. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies showed that at Iron Mountain, California, T. ferrooxidans occurs in peripheral slime-based communities (at pH over 1.3 and temperature under 30 degreesC) but not in important subsurface acid-forming environments (pH 0.3 to 0.7, temperature 30 degrees to 50 degreesC). Leptospirillum ferrooxidans is abundant in slimes and as a planktonic organism in environments with lower pH. Thiobacillus ferrooxidans affects the precipitation of ferric iron solids but plays a limited role in acid generation, and neither species controls direct catalysis at low pH at this site.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hydrometallurgy
                Hydrometallurgy
                Elsevier BV
                0304386X
                August 2020
                August 2020
                : 195
                : 105356
                Article
                10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105356
                a2fc60d4-b802-45a2-a487-05b9a45eece7
                © 2020

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article