12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Screening faecal microbiota transplant donors for SARS-CoV-2 by molecular testing of stool is the safest way forward

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We thank Gianluca Ianiro and colleagues 1 for highlighting an important concern faced by faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) stakeholders, including stool banks, regulators, and especially recipients, during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The authors are right in highlighting the concern arising from the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in stool samples and the safety implications for FMT donor screening policies. However, we strongly believe that the approach taken by the authors in excluding donors on the basis of having developed COVID-19 symptoms, having had contact with patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease, or having recently travelled to regions affected by COVID-19, is insufficient and potentially unsafe. The world is currently amid a global pandemic, exacerbated by a large burden of asymptomatic or mild cases; as of March 19, 2020, more than 80 000 known cases have been reported in Europe and the UK. 2 Exclusion on the proposed criteria of clinical disease, or travel exposure to perceived high-risk countries, or both, can no longer be considered sufficient. This point is particularly important, because cities and countries where FMT donor stool banks are based now have community outbreaks and in some areas they are registering as many, if not more, patients with COVID-19 than earlier reported rates from high-risk category countries. 2 Furthermore, the authors have not taken into account the large group of asymptomatic carriers who could potentially shed virus in the stool for an undefined period of time, and that during this period they should be ineligible as donors.3, 4 There have been two safety alerts by the US Food and Drug Administration on serious adverse events that were likely to have resulted from the transmission of pathogenic organisms via a FMT. The alert from March 12, 2020, was the result of potentially detectable enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Shiga-toxin-producing E coli. 5 In the current situation, screening policies for FMT donors ought to remain stringent, safe, effective, and scientifically justified wherever possible. The recipients of FMT globally are often patients who are older (aged >65 years), with multiple comorbidities, or immunocompromised with Clostridioides difficile infections. Therefore, minimising the potential to transmit pathogens through FMT depends on FMT providers and robust screening procedures. The University of Birmingham Microbiome Treatment Centre is the second largest provider of FMT for treatment globally, and we are running the largest FMT trial for inflammatory bowel disease (STOP-Colitis) 6 in the world to date. Our donor eligibility criteria, based on our published guidelines, would exclude FMT derived from any individual with symptoms of COVID-19. 7 In addition to these criteria, as of January, 2020, FMT produced from the date of detection of the first cases of COVID-19 have been quarantined from use until a time when a validated stool test for SARS-CoV-2 becomes available. We are not currently processing any new donors, but we anticipate that this situation will delay the availability of FMT for only a short period of time, because such tests are in rapid development. 8 We believe that the molecular screening of stool from all donors for SARS-CoV-2 will be the safest way forward, because this approach would adequately address and mitigate against the risk posed from asymptomatic carriage and might also provide a useful measure of asymptomatic prevalence in the wider community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens

          This study describes results of PCR and viral RNA testing for SARS-CoV-2 in bronchoalveolar fluid, sputum, feces, blood, and urine specimens from patients with COVID-19 infection in China to identify possible means of non-respiratory transmission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19

            This study describes possible transmission of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from an asymptomatic Wuhan resident to 5 family members in Anyang, a Chinese city in the neighboring province of Hubei.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding

              We report epidemiological and clinical investigations on ten pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection cases confirmed by real-time reverse transcription PCR assay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Symptoms in these cases were nonspecific and no children required respiratory support or intensive care. Chest X-rays lacked definite signs of pneumonia, a defining feature of the infection in adult cases. Notably, eight children persistently tested positive on rectal swabs even after nasopharyngeal testing was negative, raising the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
                The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2468-1253
                30 March 2020
                June 2020
                30 March 2020
                : 5
                : 6
                : 531
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Birmingham Microbiome Treatment Centre, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
                [b ]University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
                [c ]Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
                [d ]Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [e ]Gastroenterology Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
                [f ]Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital, London, UK
                Article
                S2468-1253(20)30089-3
                10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30089-3
                7225406
                32240618
                a308e188-38e8-4a3b-ab21-998bfec23756
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article