30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effective Leadership of Surgical Teams: A Mixed Methods Study of Surgeon Behaviors and Functions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The importance of effective team leadership for achieving surgical excellence is widely accepted, but we understand less about the behaviors that achieve this goal. We studied cardiac surgical teams to identify leadership behaviors that best support surgical teamwork.

          Methods

          We observed, surveyed, and interviewed cardiac surgical teams, including 7 surgeons and 116 team members, from September 2013 to April 2015. We documented 1,926 surgeon/team member interactions during 22 cases, coded them by behavior type and valence (ie, positive/negative/neutral), and characterized them by leadership function (conductor, elucidator, delegator, engagement facilitator, tone setter, being human, and safe space maker) to create a novel framework of surgical leadership derived from direct observation. We surveyed nonsurgeon team members about their perceptions of individual surgeon's leadership effectiveness on a 7-point Likert scale and correlated survey measures with individual surgeon profiles created by calculating percentage of behavior types, leader functions, and valence.

          Results

          Surgeon leadership was rated by nonsurgeons from 4.2 to 6.2 (mean, 5.4). Among the 33 types of behaviors observed, most interactions constituted elucidating (24%) and tone setting (20%). Overall, 66% of interactions (range, 43%–84%) were positive and 11% (range, 1%–45%) were negative. The percentage of positive and negative behaviors correlated strongly ( r = 0.85 for positive and r = 0.75 for negative, p < 0.05) with nonsurgeon evaluations of leadership. Facilitating engagement related most positively ( r = 0.80; p = 0.03), and negative forms of elucidating, ie, criticism, related most negatively ( r = –0.81; p = 0.03).

          Conclusions

          We identified 7 surgeon leadership functions and related behaviors that impact perceptions of leadership. These observations suggest actionable opportunities to improve team leadership behavior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial.

          Iatrogenesis often results from performance deficiencies among medical team members. Team-targeted rudeness may underlie such performance deficiencies, with individuals exposed to rude behavior being less helpful and cooperative. Our objective was to explore the impact of rudeness on the performance of medical teams.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Does teamwork improve performance in the operating room? A multilevel evaluation.

            Medical care is a team effort, especially as patient cases are more complex. Communication, cooperation, and coordination are vital to effective care, especially in complex service lines such as the operating room (OR). Team training, specifically the TeamSTEPPS training program, has been touted as one methodology for optimizing teamwork among providers and increasing patient safety. Although such team-training programs have transformed the culture and outcomes of other dynamic, high-risk industries such as aviation and nuclear power, evidence of team training effectiveness in health care is still evolving. Although providers tend to react positively to many training programs, evidence that training contributes to important behavioral and patient safety outcomes is lacking. A multilevel evaluation of the TeamSTEPPS training program was conducted within the OR service line with a control location. The evaluation was a mixed-model design with one between-groups factor (TeamSTEPPS training versus no training) and two within-groups factors (time period, team). The groups were located at separate campuses to minimize treatment diffusion. Trainee reactions, learning, behaviors in the OR, and proxy outcome measures such as the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) and Operating Room Management Attitudes Questionnaire (ORMAQ) were collected. All levels of evaluation demonstrated positive results. The trained group demonstrated significant increases in the quantity and quality of presurgical procedure briefings and the use of quality teamwork behaviors during cases. Increases were also found in perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork attitudes. The hospital system has integrated elements of TeamSTEPPS into orientation training provided to all incoming hospital employees, including nonclinical staff.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coaching Non-technical Skills Improves Surgical Residents' Performance in a Simulated Operating Room.

              To investigate the effect of coaching on non-technical skills and performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a simulated operating room (OR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann Thorac Surg
                Ann. Thorac. Surg
                The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
                Elsevier
                0003-4975
                1552-6259
                1 August 2017
                August 2017
                : 104
                : 2
                : 530-537
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Health Research and Policy, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [b ]Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [c ]Health Care Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [d ]Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
                [e ]Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [f ]Negotiation, Organizations & Markets, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                [∗∗ ]Address correspondence to Dr Singer, Department of Health Research and Policy, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115.Department of Health Research and PolicyHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health677 Huntington AveBostonMA 02115 ssinger@ 123456hsph.harvard.edu
                [∗]

                Juliana L. Stone is the recipient of the 2016 Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Carolyn Reed President's Award.

                Article
                S0003-4975(17)30065-6
                10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.021
                5527126
                28395873
                a37ecaf4-bb20-4cac-86b9-0170b8aa4fd6
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 4 January 2017
                Categories
                Original Article
                Adult Cardiac

                Comments

                Comment on this article