102
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The rapid growth of the Internet provides a wealth of new research opportunities for psychologists. Internet data collection methods, with a focus on self-report questionnaires from self-selected samples, are evaluated and compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods. Six preconceptions about Internet samples and data quality are evaluated by comparing a new large Internet sample (N = 361,703) with a set of 510 published traditional samples. Internet samples are shown to be relatively diverse with respect to gender, socioeconomic status, geographic region, and age. Moreover, Internet findings generalize across presentation formats, are not adversely affected by nonserious or repeat responders, and are consistent with findings from traditional methods. It is concluded that Internet methods can contribute to many areas of psychology.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am Psychol
          The American psychologist
          American Psychological Association (APA)
          0003-066X
          0003-066X
          March 3 2004
          : 59
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. gosling@psy.utexas.edu
          Article
          2004-11287-002
          10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
          14992636

          Comments

          Comment on this article