5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Freezing urine reduces its efficacy for eliciting ultrasonic vocalizations from male mice

      , ,
      Physiology & Behavior
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies on chemosensory communication generally rely on using samples of emanations that have been frozen for convenience, and assume that freezing has no detrimental effects. Female urine triggers courtship ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in male mice, and in this study, we examined whether freezing urine affects males' USV responses. We used wild-derived house mice (Mus musculus musculus), and recorded males' USVs after being presented samples of fresh versus frozen urine. We found that males emitted significantly fewer USVs when presented with frozen versus fresh urine, and furthermore, males were no longer able to discriminate the scent of familiar versus unfamiliar females after samples were frozen. Our findings indicate that freezing alters the bioactivity of urinary compounds both by reducing its potential to elicit behavioral responses from receivers (male courtship USVs) and eliminating important information about senders (familiarity). Freezing may denature the major urinary proteins (MUPs) released in rodent urine that play an important role in chemical communication. Our results raise concerns about the negative results of studies utilizing frozen samples for studying chemical signals.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Physiology & Behavior
          Physiology & Behavior
          Elsevier BV
          00319384
          March 2009
          March 2009
          : 96
          : 4-5
          : 602-605
          Article
          10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.12.014
          19150619
          a3bc8351-4981-4d6e-933b-f414d6642b6a
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article