7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Differential bitterness in capsaicin, piperine, and ethanol associates with polymorphisms in multiple bitter taste receptor genes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To date, the majority of research exploring associations with genetic variability in bitter taste receptors has understandably focused on compounds and foods that are predominantly or solely perceived as bitter. However, other chemosensory stimuli are also known to elicit bitterness as a secondary sensation. Here we investigated whether TAS2R variation explains individual differences in bitterness elicited by chemesthetic stimuli, including capsaicin, piperine and ethanol. We confirmed that capsaicin, piperine and ethanol elicit bitterness in addition to burning/stinging sensations. Variability in perceived bitterness of capsaicin and ethanol were significantly associated with TAS2R38 and TAS2R3/4/5 diplotypes. For TAS2R38, PAV homozygotes perceived greater bitterness from capsaicin and ethanol presented on circumvallate papillae, compared to heterozygotes and AVI homozygotes. For TAS2R3/4/5, CCCAGT homozygotes rated the greatest bitterness, compared to heterozygotes and TTGGAG homozygotes, for both ethanol and capsaicin when presented on circumvallate papillae. Additional work is needed to determine how these and other chemesthetic stimuli differ in bitterness perception across concentrations and presentation methods. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to determine which TAS2R receptors are activated in vitro by chemesthetic compounds.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0151504
          6462
          Physiol Behav
          Physiol. Behav.
          Physiology & behavior
          0031-9384
          1873-507X
          20 May 2016
          16 January 2016
          15 March 2016
          15 March 2017
          : 156
          : 117-127
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Sensory Evaluation Center, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
          [2 ]Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
          [3 ]Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence Rhode Island, USA
          [4 ]Division of Behavior Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence Rhode Island, USA
          [5 ]Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence Rhode Island, USA
          Author notes
          [* ] Correspondence: Dr. John E. Hayes, Department of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University, 220 Food Science Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA, jeh40@ 123456psu.edu
          Article
          PMC4898060 PMC4898060 4898060 nihpa788111
          10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.017
          4898060
          26785164
          a3e18840-f872-43cf-adb4-b7c3f9bf71f8
          History
          Categories
          Article

          genetics,taste phenotype,alcohol,preference,chemosensory
          genetics, taste phenotype, alcohol, preference, chemosensory

          Comments

          Comment on this article