16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing Habitat Use by Snapper ( Chrysophrys auratus) from Baited Underwater Video Data in a Coastal Marine Park

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Baited Underwater Video (BUV) systems have become increasingly popular for assessing marine biodiversity. These systems provide video footage from which biologists can identify the individual fish species present. Here we explore the relevance of spatial dependence and marine park boundaries while estimating the distribution and habitat associations of the commercially and recreationally important snapper species Chrysophrys auratus in Moreton Bay Marine Park during a period when new Marine National Parks zoned as no-take or “green” areas (i.e., areas with no legal fishing) were introduced. BUV studies typically enforce a minimum distance among BUV sites, and then assume that observations from different sites are independent conditional on the measured covariates. In this study, we additionally incorporated the spatial dependence among BUV sites into the modelling framework. This modelling approach allowed us to test whether or not the incorporation of highly correlated environmental covariates or the geographic placement of BUV sites produced spatial dependence, which if unaccounted for could lead to model bias. We fitted Bayesian logistic models with and without spatial random effects to determine if the Marine National Park boundaries and available environmental covariates had an effect on snapper presence and habitat preference. Adding the spatial dependence component had little effect on the resulting model parameter estimates that emphasized positive association for particular coastal habitat types by snapper. Strong positive relationships between the presence of snapper and rock habitat, particularly rocky substrate composed of indurated freshwater sediments known as coffee rock, and kelp habitat reinforce the consideration of habitat availability in marine reserve design and the design of any associated monitoring programs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor
          Journal
          PLoS One
          PLoS ONE
          plos
          plosone
          PLoS ONE
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
          1932-6203
          2015
          28 August 2015
          : 10
          : 8
          : e0136799
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
          [2 ]Digital Productivity Flagship, CSIRO, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia
          [3 ]Digital Productivity Flagship, CSIRO, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
          [4 ]Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, CSIRO, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia
          The Australian National University, AUSTRALIA
          Author notes

          Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

          Conceived and designed the experiments: MDEH RCB. Performed the experiments: MDEH RCB. Analyzed the data: MAT EL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MDEH RCB. Wrote the paper: MAT EL GRH MDEH RCB.

          Article
          PONE-D-15-26355
          10.1371/journal.pone.0136799
          4552837
          26317655
          a42416ee-7808-4511-a8b4-7435d5afeefe
          Copyright @ 2015

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

          History
          : 18 June 2015
          : 7 August 2015
          Page count
          Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Pages: 19
          Funding
          This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government′s National Environmental Research Program (NERP). NERP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania; CSIRO, Geoscience Australia, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museum Victoria, Charles Darwin University and the University of Western Australia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funding for the fieldwork was jointly (50:50) provided by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research and DERM (Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management).
          Categories
          Research Article
          Custom metadata
          All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

          Uncategorized
          Uncategorized

          Comments

          Comment on this article