15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biological effects of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Patients with SCAD and concomitant COPD are at high risk of cardiovascular adverse events, due to chronic inflammation, responsible of endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and heightened platelet reactivity (PR). The objective of this randomised clinical trial was to test if ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Forty-six patients with SCAD and COPD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (n=23) or ticagrelor (n=23) on top of standard therapy with aspirin. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and after 1 month: i) rate of apoptosis and ii) nitric oxide (NO) levels in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), iii) levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in peripheral blood mononuclear cell, iv) 29 cytokines/chemokines, v) on-treatment PR. The primary endpoint of the study was the 1-month rate of HUVECs apoptosis. The rate of apoptosis after 1 month was significantly lower in patients treated with ticagrelor (7.4 ± 1.3% vs 9.3 ± 1.5%, p<0.001), satisfying the pre-specified primary endpoint. In the ticagrelor arm, levels of NO were higher (10.1 ± 2.2 AU vs 8.5 ± 2.6 AU, p=0.03) while those of ROS (4 ± 1.8 AU vs 5.7 ± 2.8 AU, p=0.02) and P2Y 12 reactivity units (52 ± 70 PRU vs 155 ± 62 PRU, p<0.001) were lower. There were no differences in cytokines/chemokines levels and aspirin reactivity units between groups. In patients with SCAD and COPD undergoing PCI, ticagrelor, as compared to clopidogrel is superior in improving surrogate markers of endothelial function and on-treatment PR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02519608).

          Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          From COPD to chronic systemic inflammatory syndrome?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

            The purpose of the study was to systematically evaluate the significance of platelet reactivity on clopidogrel treatment on adverse cardiovascular events using a collaborative meta-analysis using patient-level data for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California). Clinical evidence has been controversial regarding the influence of clopidogrel on treatment platelet reactivity and ischemic outcomes. MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane library databases were searched through January 2010. A database containing individual patient-level time-to-event data was generated from identified studies. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stent thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of: 1) death; 2) MI; and 3) stent thrombosis. A total of 6 studies with 3,059 patients was included. In each study, clopidogrel responsiveness was assessed using the same point-of-care assay after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in higher quartiles of P2Y(12) reaction unit (PRU) values: quartile I, 5.8%; quartile II, 6.9%; quartile III, 10.9%; quartile IV, 15.8% (p < 0.001). Taking quartile I as referent, the hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary endpoint were as follows: quartile II, HR: 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 1.78; p = 0.60); quartile III, HR: 1.82 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.75; p = 0.005); quartile IV, HR: 2.62 (95% CI: 1.78 to 3.87; p < 0.001). On a continuous scale, every 10-U increase in PRU was associated with a significantly higher rate of the primary endpoint (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06; p < 0.0001). According to receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a PRU value of 230 appeared to best predict death, MI, or stent thrombosis (p < 0.001). A PRU value ≥230 was associated with a higher rate of the composite primary endpoint (HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.73; p < 0.0001), as well as the individual endpoints of death (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.68; p = 0.04), MI (HR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.76; p < 0.001), and stent thrombosis (HR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.50 to 6.46; p = 0.002). In this collaborative meta-analysis, the level of on-treatment platelet reactivity according to the P2Y(12) assay is associated with long-term cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention, including death, MI, and stent thrombosis. Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ticagrelor increases adenosine plasma concentration in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.

              This study aimed to investigate the impact of ticagrelor on adenosine plasma concentration (APC) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker. The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in ACS patients suggests that the drug has non-platelet-directed properties. Animal and in vitro models suggested that the "pleiotropic" properties of ticagrelor may be related to an interaction with adenosine metabolism. We prospectively randomized 60 ACS patients to receive ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The APC was measured by liquid chromatography. To assess the mechanism of APC variation, we measured adenosine deaminase concentration, adenosine uptake by red blood cells, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by cells overexpressing adenosine receptors. The P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor blockade was assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index. Patients receiving ticagrelor had significantly higher APC than patients receiving clopidogrel (1.5 μM [interquartile range: 0.98 to 1.7 μM] vs. 0.68 μM [interquartile range: 0.49 to 0.78 μM]; p < 0.01). The APC was not correlated with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (p = 0.16). Serum-containing ticagrelor inhibited adenosine uptake by red blood cells compared with clopidogrel or controls (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Adenosine deaminase activity was similar in serum of patients receiving clopidogrel or ticagrelor (p = 0.1). Ticagrelor and clopidogrel had no direct impact on adenosine receptors (p = not significant). Ticagrelor increases APC in ACS patients compared with clopidogrel by inhibiting adenosine uptake by red blood cells. Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Thromb Haemost
                Thromb. Haemost
                10.1055/s-00035024
                Thrombosis and Haemostasis
                Schattauer GmbH
                0340-6245
                2567-689X
                June 2017
                07 November 2017
                : 117
                : 6
                : 1208-1216
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Italy
                [2 ]Laboratorio per le Tecnologie delle Terapie Avanzate (LTTA) Center, Ferrara, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                [4 ]Research Centre on Asthma and COPD, Section of Internal and Cardio-Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                [6 ]Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, E. S.: Health Science Foundation, Cotignola, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Gianluca Campo, MD Cardiovascular InstituteAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.AnnaVia A. Moro 8Cona (FE), Italy+39 0532237079+39 0532241885 cmpglc@ 123456unife.it
                Article
                10.1160/TH16-12-0973
                6291849
                28331925
                a44c4ca3-47f9-4e80-9776-68ab519c34cd

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 December 2016
                : 08 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: AstraZeneca
                Award ID: ESR-14-10659
                Financial support: This study was partially supported by a research grant [ESR-14-10659] from AstraZeneca, which had no role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the paper for publication.
                Categories
                Atherosclerosis and Ischaemic Disease

                ticagrelor,clopidogrel,endothelial function,stable coronary artery disease,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article