47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recurrent Endophthalmitis after Trabeculectomy for Glaucoma: Importance of Timely Filtering Bleb Coverage for the Conjunctiva

      case-report
      *
      Case Reports in Ophthalmology
      S. Karger AG
      Glaucoma surgery, Complications, Endophthalmitis, Vitrectomy, Filtering bleb

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To report the occurrence of endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy for glaucoma that was treated by vitrectomy without bleb closure and recurred 3 times after an initial clinically inapparent period of about 2 years.

          Methods

          Interventional case report and short review of the pertinent literature.

          Results

          A 73-year-old Caucasian female underwent trabeculectomy (without mitomycin) for glaucoma. Four years after the trabeculectomy, an endophthalmitis with Staphylococcus epidermidis as the causative organism occurred and was treated with a pars plana vitrectomy (20-gauge) and a combined antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drug regimen. The bleb was not covered during the emergency procedure because the filtering bleb was heavily infected and filled with pus. As the filtering bleb healed nicely and the filtering function was restored, the filtering bleb was left as it was, and best-corrected visual acuity initially recovered to 0.8. After 22 months, the endophthalmitis recurred, this time with Enterococcus faecalis as the causative organism. Its treatment required a total of four further vitrectomies (23-gauge), each accompanied by the same antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drug regimen that had been applied previously. However, the visual acuity could not be preserved, and the eye is blind with defective light projection.

          Conclusions

          The literature suggests an aggressive surgical approach to endophthalmitis, and the present case report confirms this. Since the visual prognosis of eyes after endophthalmitis is poor, the course of treatment for endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy should emphasize recurrence prophylaxis rather than address glaucoma symptoms and therefore include safe bleb leak coverage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis: clinical features and visual acuity outcomes.

          To investigate clinical factors, causative organisms, treatments, and visual acuity and intraocular pressure outcomes associated with delayed-onset, bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. All patients treated for bleb-associated endophthalmitis at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between January 1, 1996, and July 1, 2001. All patients had prior glaucoma filtering surgery. Patients with inadvertent functioning blebs after cataract extraction were excluded. Visual acuity outcomes and intraocular pressure control after endophthalmitis. An antifibrotic agent was used in 40 (82%) of the 49 eyes identified, including mitomycin-C in 33 (67%) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 7 (14%). The mean interval between the initial filtering surgery and endophthalmitis diagnosis was 5.0 years (range, 0.7-12.2 years). The mean follow-up time after treatment for endophthalmitis was 6.9 months (range, 1-60 months). As recorded in the medical record, potential risk factors and clinical features among the study population included history of bleb leak in 13 (27%) eyes, bleb manipulations in 15 (31%) (needling in 3 [6%], compression sutures in 2 [4%], laser suture lysis in 6 [12%], bleb revision in 5 [10%], and autologous blood injection in 2 [4%]), bleb defects in 6 (12%), inferior bleb location 6 (12%), and nasolacrimal duct obstruction in 1 (2%). The most common causative organisms were Streptococcus species in 15 eyes (31%) and Staphylococcus species in 11 eyes (22%). Final visual acuities in the vitrectomy group (n = 22) versus the initial tap group (n = 26) were as follows: > or = 20/40 (5% versus 15%), 20/50 to 20/400 (32% versus 54%), and 21 mmHg) after treatment of endophthalmitis. Streptococcus species and Staphylococcus species were the most common causative organisms in the current series of patients with delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Despite successful treatment of the infection, visual outcomes are generally poor.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis (1996-2008): causative organisms and visual acuity outcomes.

            The purpose of this study was to report the clinical features, organisms, and outcomes of patients with delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Retrospective consecutive case series. Patients who were treated for delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis between January 1, 1996, and July 1, 2008, at a single institution were included. Information on visual acuities, clinical characteristics, causative organisms, and treatment outcomes were collected. Infections within 1 month of glaucoma filtering surgery, inadvertent filtering blebs after cataract surgery, and patients with glaucoma drainage devices were excluded. A total of 71 eyes from 68 patients were identified. An adjunctive antifibrotic agent was used in 48 eyes (68%). The mean time between surgery and endophthalmitis was 4.8 years (range, 0.1-16; standard deviation, 3.6). The average follow-up time after initial treatment was 37 months (range 1-144; standard deviation, 41). At presentation, 17 eyes (24%) had a bleb leak. Fifty-seven eyes (83%) were culture positive. The most common causative organisms were Streptococcus species in 20 eyes (30%), gram-negative organisms in 19 eyes (28%), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 12 eyes (18%). All gram-positive isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. Nine eyes (13%) eventually underwent evisceration or enucleation secondary to pain and/or poor vision. The main outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up examination. Final visual acuities in the initial tap/inject group (n = 45) versus the initial vitrectomy group (n = 24) were as follows: ≥ 20/40 (29% vs. 4.2%), 20/50 to 20/400 (36% vs. 29%), and <5/200 (36% vs. 62%). Streptococcus species and gram-negative organisms were the most common causative isolates identified in this case series of delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Despite treatment of the infection, visual outcomes were generally poor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Chronic Postoperative Endophthalmitis: A Review of Clinical Characteristics, Microbiology, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes

              Chronic postoperative endophthalmitis (CPE) is a delayed infectious intraocular inflammation process that occurs more than six weeks after ocular surgery and frequently masquerades as autoimmune uveitis. These cases are at risk of delayed diagnosis and erroneous long-term treatment with corticosteroids. This paper aims to review the epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, management strategies, and outcome of chronic postoperative endophthalmitis. The incidence of CPE is still uncommon, and multiple pathogens have been reported with varying frequencies. Review of the literature reveals that CPE cases have a high incidence of visual impairment and recurrence rate might be decreased with aggressive surgical approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Report Ophthalmol
                Case Report Ophthalmol
                COP
                Case Reports in Ophthalmology
                S. Karger AG (Allschwilerstrasse 10, P.O. Box · Postfach · Case postale, CH–4009, Basel, Switzerland · Schweiz · Suisse, Phone: +41 61 306 11 11, Fax: +41 61 306 12 34, karger@karger.ch )
                1663-2699
                Sep-Dec 2012
                23 October 2012
                23 October 2012
                : 3
                : 3
                : 360-363
                Affiliations
                Augenklinik Herzog Carl Theodor, Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                *Carl-Ludwig Schönfeld, Augenklinik Herzog Carl Theodor, Nymphenburger Strasse 43, DE–80335 München (Germany), E-Mail cb.schoenfeld@ 123456gmx.net
                Article
                cop-0003-0360
                10.1159/000343918
                3506033
                23185177
                a453927e-40ab-48cb-9226-704de04d8512
                Copyright © 2012 by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivative-Works License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.

                History
                Page count
                References: 16, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Published online: October, 2012

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                endophthalmitis,complications,filtering bleb,vitrectomy,glaucoma surgery
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                endophthalmitis, complications, filtering bleb, vitrectomy, glaucoma surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article