17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification and Expression of the CCAP Receptor in the Chagas’ Disease Vector, Rhodnius prolixus, and Its Involvement in Cardiac Control

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rhodnius prolixus is the vector of Chagas’ disease, by virtue of transmitting the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. There is no cure for Chagas’ disease and therefore controlling R. prolixus is currently the only method of prevention. Understanding the physiology of the disease vector is an important step in developing control measures. Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) is an important neuropeptide in insects because it has multiple physiological roles such as controlling heart rate and modulating ecdysis behaviour. In this study, we have cloned the cDNA sequence of the CCAP receptor ( RhoprCCAPR) from 5 th instar R. prolixus and found it to be a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). The spatial expression pattern in 5 th instars reveals that the RhoprCCAPR transcript levels are high in the central nervous system, hindgut and female reproductive systems, and lower in the salivary glands, male reproductive tissues and a pool of tissues including the dorsal vessel, trachea, and fat body. Interestingly, the RhoprCCAPR expression is increased prior to ecdysis and decreased post-ecdysis. A functional receptor expression assay confirms that the RhoprCCAPR is activated by CCAP (EC 50 = 12 nM) but not by adipokinetic hormone, corazonin or an extended FMRFamide. The involvement of CCAP in controlling heartbeat frequency was studied in vivo and in vitro by utilizing RNA interference. In vivo, the basal heartbeat frequency is decreased by 31% in bugs treated with dsCCAPR. Knocking down the receptor in dsCCAPR-treated bugs also resulted in loss of function of applied CCAP in vitro. This is the first report of a GPCR knock-down in R. prolixus and the first report showing that a reduction in CCAPR transcript levels leads to a reduction in cardiac output in any insect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An analysis of vertebrate mRNA sequences: intimations of translational control

          M Kozak (1991)
          Five structural features in mRNAs have been found to contribute to the fidelity and efficiency of initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Scrutiny of vertebrate cDNA sequences in light of these criteria reveals a set of transcripts--encoding oncoproteins, growth factors, transcription factors, and other regulatory proteins--that seem designed to be translated poorly. Thus, throttling at the level of translation may be a critical component of gene regulation in vertebrates. An alternative interpretation is that some (perhaps many) cDNAs with encumbered 5' noncoding sequences represent mRNA precursors, which would imply extensive regulation at a posttranscriptional step that precedes translation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            G protein coupled receptor structure and activation.

            G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are remarkably versatile signaling molecules. The members of this large family of membrane proteins are activated by a spectrum of structurally diverse ligands, and have been shown to modulate the activity of different signaling pathways in a ligand specific manner. In this manuscript I will review what is known about the structure and mechanism of activation of GPCRs focusing primarily on two model systems, rhodopsin and the beta(2) adrenoceptor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes.

              Recognition of an AUG initiator codon in a suboptimal context improves when a modest amount of secondary structure is introduced near the beginning of the protein-coding sequence. This facilitating effect depends on the position of the downstream stem-loop (hairpin) structure. The strongest facilitation is seen when the hairpin is separated from the preceding AUG codon by 14 nucleotides. Because 14 nucleotides corresponds to the approximate distance between the leading edge of the ribosome and its AUG-recognition center as measured by ribonuclease protection experiments, a likely explanation for the enhancing effect of a downstream hairpin is that secondary structure slows scanning, thereby providing more time for recognition of the AUG codon, and the facilitation is greatest when the 40S ribosome stalls with its AUG-recognition center directly over the AUG. The variable ability of mammalian ribosomes to initiate at non-AUG codons in vitro is also explicable by the presence or absence of a stem-loop structure just downstream from the alternative initiator codon. This may be relevant to recent reports of adventitious upstream initiation events at non-AUG codons in some vertebrate mRNAs that have structure-prone, G + C-rich leader sequences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                9 July 2013
                : 8
                : 7
                : e68897
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Germany
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: DL JVB AL. Performed the experiments: DL. Analyzed the data: DL JVB AL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DL JVB AL. Wrote the paper: DL JVB AL.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-13003
                10.1371/journal.pone.0068897
                3706402
                23874803
                a462379a-962b-4ffd-b19e-79e5dbb13f4d
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 March 2013
                : 9 June 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Cardiovascular System
                Circulatory Physiology
                Endocrine System
                Endocrine Physiology
                Endocrine Cells
                Hormones
                Neuroendocrinology
                Neurological System
                Central Nervous System
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Gene Expression
                RNA interference
                Neuroscience
                Neurophysiology
                Central Nervous System
                Zoology
                Animal Physiology
                Herpetology
                Medicine
                Infectious Diseases
                Vectors and Hosts

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article