17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Satellite-based assessment of yield variation and its determinants in smallholder African systems

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="d11599588e207">Improvements in agricultural productivity in developing countries are thought to play a key role in poverty reduction. Unfortunately, such productivity remains poorly measured throughout much of the world, hampering efforts to evaluate and target productivity-enhancing interventions. Using high-resolution satellite imagery in combination with field data we collected from thousands of smallholder plots in Kenya, we show that satellite imagery can be used to estimate and understand yield variation at the field scale across African smallholders. Our results suggest a range of potential capabilities, including the inexpensive measurement of the impact of specific interventions, the broader characterization of the source and magnitude of yield gaps, and the development of financial products aimed at African smallholders. </p><p class="first" id="d11599588e210">The emergence of satellite sensors that can routinely observe millions of individual smallholder farms raises possibilities for monitoring and understanding agricultural productivity in many regions of the world. Here we demonstrate the potential to track smallholder maize yield variation in western Kenya, using a combination of 1-m Terra Bella imagery and intensive field sampling on thousands of fields over 2 y. We find that agreement between satellite-based and traditional field survey-based yield estimates depends significantly on the quality of the field-based measures, with agreement highest ( <span class="inline-formula"> <math id="i1" overflow="scroll"> <msup> <mtext>R</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math> </span> up to 0.4) when using precise field measures of plot area and when using larger fields for which rounding errors are smaller. We further show that satellite-based measures are able to detect positive yield responses to fertilizer and hybrid seed inputs and that the inferred responses are statistically indistinguishable from estimates based on survey-based yields. These results suggest that high-resolution satellite imagery can be used to make predictions of smallholder agricultural productivity that are roughly as accurate as the survey-based measures traditionally used in research and policy applications, and they indicate a substantial near-term potential to quickly generate useful datasets on productivity in smallholder systems, even with minimal or no field training data. Such datasets could rapidly accelerate learning about which interventions in smallholder systems have the most positive impact, thus enabling more rapid transformation of rural livelihoods. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Crop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes, and Causes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                February 28 2017
                February 28 2017
                : 114
                : 9
                : 2189-2194
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.1616919114
                5338538
                28202728
                a4650a6a-84df-4333-95e4-53e8bb2a9fe8
                © 2017

                http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/userlicense.xhtml

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article