13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In a series of experiments, the authors investigated whether naming latencies for homophones (e.g., /nlambdan/) are a function of specific-word frequency (i.e., the frequency of nun) or a function of cumulative-homophone frequency (i.e., the sum of the frequencies of nun and none). Specific-word but not cumulative-homophone frequency affected picture-naming latencies. This result was obtained in 2 languages (English and Chinese). An analogous finding was obtained in a translation task, where bilingual speakers produced the English names of visually presented Spanish words. Control experiments ruled out that these results are an artifact of orthographic or articulatory factors, or of visual recognition. The results argue against the hypothesis that homophones share a common word-form representation, and support instead a model in which homophones have fully independent representations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How Many Levels of Processing Are There in Lexical Access?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Models of word production.

            Research on spoken word production has been approached from two angles. In one research tradition, the analysis of spontaneous or induced speech errors led to models that can account for speech error distributions. In another tradition, the measurement of picture naming latencies led to chronometric models accounting for distributions of reaction times in word production. Both kinds of models are, however, dealing with the same underlying processes: (1) the speaker's selection of a word that is semantically and syntactically appropriate; (2) the retrieval of the word's phonological properties; (3) the rapid syllabification of the word in context; and (4) the preparation of the corresponding articulatory gestures. Models of both traditions explain these processes in terms of activation spreading through a localist, symbolic network. By and large, they share the main levels of representation: conceptual/semantic, syntactic, phonological and phonetic. They differ in various details, such as the amount of cascading and feedback in the network. These research traditions have begun to merge in recent years, leading to highly constructive experimentation. Currently, they are like two similar knives honing each other. A single pair of scissors is in the making.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
                Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
                American Psychological Association (APA)
                1939-1285
                0278-7393
                2001
                2001
                : 27
                : 6
                : 1430-1450
                Article
                10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1430
                11713878
                a4862bf9-93be-47f3-9f4c-2eef53be6383
                © 2001
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article