35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Morphinofobia: the situation among the general population and health care professionals in North-Eastern Portugal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Morphinofobia among the general population (GP) and among health care professionals (HP) is not without danger for the patients: it may lead to the inappropriate management of debilitating pain. The aim of our study was to explore among GP and HP the representation and attitudes concerning the use of morphine in health care.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study was done among 412 HP (physicians and nurses) of the 4 hospitals and 10 community health centers of Beira Interior (Portugal)and among 193 persons of the GP randomly selected in public places. Opinions were collected through a translated self-administered questionnaire.

          Results

          A significant difference of opinion exists among GP and HP about the use of morphine. The word morphine first suggests drug to GP (36,2%) and analgesia to HP (32,9%.). The reasons for not using morphine most frequently cited are: for GP morphine use means advanced disease (56%), risk of addiction (50%), legal requirements (49,7%); for HP it means legal risks (56,3%) and adverse side effects of morphine such as somnolence - sedation (30,5%) The socio-demographic situation was correlated with the opinions about the use of morphine.

          Conclusions

          False beliefs about the use of morphine exist among the studied groups. There seems to be a need for developing information campaigns on pain management and the use of morphine targeting. Better training and more information of HP might also be needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Opioid therapy for chronic pain.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations

            An expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care has revised and updated its guidelines on the use of morphine in the management of cancer pain. The revised recommendations presented here give guidance on the use of morphine and the alternative strong opioid analgesics which have been introduced in many parts of the world in recent years. Practical strategies for dealing with difficult situations are described presenting a consensus view where supporting evidence is lacking. The strength of the evidence on which each recommendation is based is indicated. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to sex differences in pain.

              Empirical research supports the existence of sex differences in pain; yet these differences are poorly understood. Although biological mechanisms have been posited to explain variability, results of pain modeling manipulations suggest social learning may be a stronger influence on pain response. In this report we use the term sex to refer to the biological category of male or female. We use the term gender to refer to the socially acquired aspects of being male or female sometimes referred to as femininity and masculinity. This study investigated a new measure, the Gender Role Expectations of Pain questionnaire (GREP), which was designed to measure sex-related stereotypic attributions of pain sensitivity, endurance, and willingness to report pain. Subjects were 156 male and 235 female undergraduates at a southeastern university. Psychometric investigation of the questionnaire revealed a 5-factor solution that closely mirrored the theoretical construction of the items. Test-retest reliability was also shown for individual items on a separate sample of 28 subjects. Results supported hypotheses about gender role: both men and women rated men as less willing to report pain than women (F(1,389) = 336, P <.001); both men and women rated women more sensitive (F(1,389) = 9.5, P <.05) and less enduring of pain (F(1,389) = 65.7, P <.001) than men; and men rated their own endurance as higher than the typical man (F(1,389) = 65.7, P <.001). Sex accounted for 46% of the variance in willingness to report pain. Results suggest that the GREP distinguished between the socially learned reactions to pain for men and women. It is recommended that the influence of gender-related expectations for pain be assessed in all studies investigating human sex differences in pain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliative Care
                BioMed Central
                1472-684X
                2010
                22 June 2010
                : 9
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Geneva Altitude Clinic, Montana, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Community health and medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
                [3 ]Formerly RN in the hospital Castèlo Branco, Beira Interior, Portugal and responsible of chirurgical ward hospital of Siders, RSV, Switzerland
                [4 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
                [5 ]Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland and Director of the Department Age, Health and Society, University Institute Kurt Bösch, Sion, Switzerland
                Article
                1472-684X-9-15
                10.1186/1472-684X-9-15
                2900233
                20569454
                a48d5c83-e7ce-4423-b079-a886a623d69c
                Copyright ©2010 Verloo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 5 May 2009
                : 22 June 2010
                Categories
                Research article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article