3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Ghana PrenaBelt trial: a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of maternal positional therapy during third-trimester sleep on birth weight

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate the effect, on birth weight and birth weight centile, of use of the PrenaBelt, a maternal positional therapy device, during sleep in the home setting throughout the third trimester of pregnancy.

          Design

          A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial.

          Setting

          Conducted from September 2015 to May 2016, at a single, tertiary-level centre in Accra, Ghana.

          Participants

          Two-hundred participants entered the study. One-hundred-eighty-one participants completed the study. Participants were women, 18 to 35 years of age, with low-risk, singleton, pregnancies in their third-trimester, with body mass index <35 kg/m 2 at the first antenatal appointment for the index pregnancy and without known foetal abnormalities, pregnancy complications or medical conditions complicating sleep.

          Interventions

          Participants were randomised by computer-generated, one-to-one, simple randomisation to receive either the PrenaBelt or sham-PrenaBelt. Participants were instructed to wear their assigned device to sleep every night for the remainder of their pregnancy (approximately 12 weeks in total) and were provided a sleep diary to track their use. Allocation concealment was by unmarked, security-tinted, sealed envelopes. Participants and the outcomes assessor were blinded to allocation.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          The primary outcomes were birth weight and birth weight centile. Secondary outcomes included adherence to using the assigned device nightly, sleeping position, pregnancy outcomes and feedback from participants and maternity personnel.

          Results

          One-hundred-sixty-seven participants were included in the primary analysis. The adherence to using the assigned device nightly was 56%. The mean ±SD birth weight in the PrenaBelt group (n=83) was 3191g±483 and in the sham-PrenaBelt group (n=84) was 3081g±484 (difference 110 g, 95% CI −38 to 258, p=0.14). The median (IQR) customised birth weight centile in the PrenaBelt group was 43% (18 to 67) and in the sham-PrenaBelt group was 31% (14 to 58) (difference 7%, 95% CI −2 to 17, p=0.11).

          Conclusions

          The PrenaBelt did not have a statistically significant effect on birth weight or birth weight centile in comparison to the sham-PrenaBelt.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02379728.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The challenge of patient adherence

          Quality healthcare outcomes depend upon patients' adherence to recommended treatment regimens. Patient nonadherence can be a pervasive threat to health and wellbeing and carry an appreciable economic burden as well. In some disease conditions, more than 40% of patients sustain significant risks by misunderstanding, forgetting, or ignoring healthcare advice. While no single intervention strategy can improve the adherence of all patients, decades of research studies agree that successful attempts to improve patient adherence depend upon a set of key factors. These include realistic assessment of patients' knowledge and understanding of the regimen, clear and effective communication between health professionals and their patients, and the nurturance of trust in the therapeutic relationship. Patients must be given the opportunity to tell the story of their unique illness experiences. Knowing the patient as a person allows the health professional to understand elements that are crucial to the patient's adherence: beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms, cultural context, social supports, and emotional health challenges, particularly depression. Physician–patient partnerships are essential when choosing amongst various therapeutic options to maximize adherence. Mutual collaboration fosters greater patient satisfaction, reduces the risks of nonadherence, and improves patients' healthcare outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study

            Objectives To determine whether snoring, sleep position, and other sleep practices in pregnant women are associated with risk of late stillbirth. Design Prospective population based case-control study. Setting Auckland, New Zealand Participants Cases: 155 women with a singleton late stillbirth (≥28 weeks’ gestation) without congenital abnormality born between July 2006 and June 2009 and booked to deliver in Auckland. Controls: 310 women with single ongoing pregnancies and gestation matched to that at which the stillbirth occurred. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for known confounding factors. Main outcome measure Maternal snoring, daytime sleepiness (measured with the Epworth sleepiness scale), and sleep position at the time of going to sleep and on waking (left side, right side, back, and other). Results The prevalence of late stillbirth in this study was 3.09/1000 births. No relation was found between snoring or daytime sleepiness and risk of late stillbirth. However, women who slept on their back or on their right side on the previous night (before stillbirth or interview) were more likely to experience a late stillbirth compared with women who slept on their left side (adjusted odds ratio for back sleeping 2.54 (95% CI 1.04 to 6.18), and for right side sleeping 1.74 (0.98 to 3.01)). The absolute risk of late stillbirth for women who went to sleep on their left was 1.96/1000 and was 3.93/1000 for women who did not go to sleep on their left. Women who got up to go to the toilet once or less on the last night were more likely to experience a late stillbirth compared with women who got up more frequently (adjusted odds ratio 2.28 (1.40 to 3.71)). Women who regularly slept during the day in the previous month were also more likely to experience a late stillbirth than those who did not (2.04 (1.26 to 3.27)). Conclusions This is the first study to report maternal sleep related practices as risk factors for stillbirth, and these findings require urgent confirmation in further studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of maternal sleep practices with pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and stillbirth among Ghanaian women.

              To assess sleep practices, and investigate their relationship with maternal and fetal outcomes, among pregnant Ghanaian women. In a cross-sectional study conducted at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, between June and July 2011, postpartum women were interviewed within 48hours of delivery about sleep quality and practices during pregnancy. Interviews were coupled with a systematic review of participants' medical charts for key outcomes including maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, low birth weight, and stillbirth. Most women reported poor sleep quality during pregnancy. Snoring during pregnancy was independently associated with pre-eclampsia (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.5; P=0.007). The newborns of women who reported supine sleep during pregnancy were at increased risk of low birth weight (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.2-20.2; P=0.025) and stillbirth (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-43.2; P=0.016). Low birth weight was found to mediate the relationship between supine sleep and stillbirth. The present findings in an African population demonstrate that maternal sleep, a modifiable risk factor, has a significant role in pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and subsequently stillbirth. Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                1 May 2019
                : 9
                : 4
                : e022981
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentObstetrics & Gynaecology , Korle Bu Teaching Hospital , Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
                [2 ] University of Ghana School of Medicine and Dentistry , Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
                [3 ] departmentBiostatistics , Korle Bu Teaching Hospital , Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
                [4 ] departmentObstetrics & Gynaecology , University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ] Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [6 ] University of Michigan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [7 ] Global Innovations for Reproductive Health & Life , Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [8 ] Georgetown University School of Medicine , Washington, District of Columbia, USA
                [9 ] Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [10 ] Innovative Canadians for Change , Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [11 ] Method Squared Designhaus , Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
                [12 ] departmentObstetrics & Gynaecology , Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Allan Kember; allan.kember@ 123456dal.ca , allankember@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-1040
                Article
                bmjopen-2018-022981
                10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022981
                6502032
                31048420
                a48e81db-3e19-4f8d-8e80-0ffb56fb39c8
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 March 2018
                : 29 March 2019
                : 01 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004828, Grand Challenges Canada;
                Categories
                Obstetrics and Gynaecology
                Research
                1506
                1609
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                obstetrics,fetal medicine,maternal medicine,stillbirth,positional therapy,low birth weight
                Medicine
                obstetrics, fetal medicine, maternal medicine, stillbirth, positional therapy, low birth weight

                Comments

                Comment on this article