78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Drosha Regulates Gene Expression Independently of RNA Cleavage Function

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Drosha is the main RNase III-like enzyme involved in the process of microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis in the nucleus. Using whole-genome ChIP-on-chip analysis, we demonstrate that, in addition to miRNA sequences, Drosha specifically binds promoter-proximal regions of many human genes in a transcription-dependent manner. This binding is not associated with miRNA production or RNA cleavage. Drosha knockdown in HeLa cells downregulated nascent gene transcription, resulting in a reduction of polyadenylated mRNA produced from these gene regions. Furthermore, we show that this function of Drosha is dependent on its N-terminal protein-interaction domain, which associates with the RNA-binding protein CBP80 and RNA Polymerase II. Consequently, we uncover a previously unsuspected RNA cleavage-independent function of Drosha in the regulation of human gene expression.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Drosha binds promoter-proximal regions of transcribed human genes

          • Drosha binding is not associated with RNA cleavage or miRNA processing

          • Drosha regulates nascent gene transcription

          • Drosha interacts with CBP80 and RNA Pol II through its N-terminal domain

          Abstract

          In higher eukaryotes, the Microprocessor complex (Drosha endonuclease and DGCR8 RNA-binding protein) recognizes and excises RNA hairpins from larger nuclear transcripts. This ultimately leads to cytoplasmic microRNA production or, in some cases, direct downregulation of gene expression through RNA cleavage. In this study, Gromak, Proudfoot, and colleagues show that Drosha-DGCR8 binds numerous gene promoters not to cleave RNA but, rather, to form a molecular interaction surface. This helps recruit additional factors to gene promoters with a consequent increase in gene activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nuclear export of microRNA precursors.

          MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which function as regulators of gene expression in eukaryotes, are processed from larger transcripts by sequential action of nuclear and cytoplasmic ribonuclease III-like endonucleases. We show that Exportin-5 (Exp5) mediates efficient nuclear export of short miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs) and that its depletion by RNA interference results in reduced miRNA levels. Exp5 binds correctly processed pre-miRNAs directly and specifically, in a Ran guanosine triphosphate-dependent manner, but interacts only weakly with extended pre-miRNAs that yield incorrect miRNAs when processed by Dicer in vitro. Thus, Exp5 is key to miRNA biogenesis and may help coordinate nuclear and cytoplasmic processing steps.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Induced ncRNAs Allosterically Modify RNA Binding Proteins in cis to Inhibit Transcription

            With the recent recognition of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) flanking many genes1-5, a central issue is to fully understand their potential roles in regulated gene transcription programs, possibly through different mechanisms6-12. Here, we report that an RNA-binding protein, TLS, serves as a key transcriptional regulatory sensor of DNA damage signals that, based on its allosteric modulation by RNA, specifically binds to and inhibits CBP/p300 HAT activities on a repressed gene target, cyclin D1 (CCND1). Recruitment of TLS to the CCND1 promoter to cause gene-specific repression is directed by single stranded, low copy number ncRNA transcripts tethered to the 5′ regulatory regions of CCND1 that are induced in response to DNA damage signals. Our data suggest that signal-induced ncRNAs localized to regulatory regions of transcription units can act cooperatively as selective ligands, recruiting and modulating the activities of distinct classes of RNA binding co-regulators in response to specific signals, providing an unexpected ncRNA/RNA-binding protein-based strategy to integrate transcriptional programs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters.

              Studies have shown that the bulk of eukaryotic genomes is transcribed. Transcriptome maps are frequently updated, but low-abundant transcripts have probably gone unnoticed. To eliminate RNA degradation, we depleted the exonucleolytic RNA exosome from human cells and then subjected the RNA to tiling microarray analysis. This revealed a class of short, polyadenylated and highly unstable RNAs. These promoter upstream transcripts (PROMPTs) are produced approximately 0.5 to 2.5 kilobases upstream of active transcription start sites. PROMPT transcription occurs in both sense and antisense directions with respect to the downstream gene. In addition, it requires the presence of the gene promoter and is positively correlated with gene activity. We propose that PROMPT transcription is a common characteristic of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcribed genes with a possible regulatory potential.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell Rep
                Cell Rep
                Cell Reports
                Cell Press
                2211-1247
                26 December 2013
                26 December 2013
                : 5
                : 6
                : 1499-1510
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK
                [2 ]MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
                [3 ]Computational Genomics Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]The Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
                [5 ]Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author natalia.gromak@ 123456path.ox.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author nicholas.proudfoot@ 123456path.ox.ac.uk
                Article
                S2211-1247(13)00699-2
                10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.032
                3898267
                24360955
                a4a7af12-1994-4ef1-8ec9-804d2a51afe8
                © 2013 The Authors

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 21 May 2013
                : 13 September 2013
                : 15 November 2013
                Categories
                Report

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article