7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Rotator Cuff Opposes Superior Translation of the Humeral Head

      1 , 1
      The American Journal of Sports Medicine
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine the influence of rotator cuff muscle activity on humeral head migration relative to the glenoid during active arm elevation we studied five fresh cadaveric shoulders. The shoulder girdles were mounted in an apparatus that simulated contraction of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles while maintaining the normal scapulothoracic relationship. The arms were abducted using four different configurations of simulated muscle activity: deltoid alone; deltoid and supraspinatus; deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis; and deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis. For each simulated muscle configuration the vertical position of the humeral head in relation to the glenoid was determined at 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of abduction using digitized anteroposterior radiographs. Both muscle activity and abduction angle significantly influenced the glenohumeral relationship. With simulated activity of the entire rotator cuff, the geometric center of the humeral head was centered in the glenoid at 30 degrees but had moved 1.5 mm superiorly by 120 degrees. Abduction without the subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor muscles caused significant superiorly directed shifts in humeral head position as did abduction using only the deltoid muscle. These results support the possible use of selective strengthening exercises for the infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis muscles in treatment of the impingement syndrome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle.

          The maximum voluntary force (strength) which could be produced by the knee-extensor muscles, with the knee held at a right angle, was measured in a group of healthy young subjects comprising twenty-five males and twenty-five females. Both legs were tested: data from the stronger leg only for each subject were used in the present study. Computed tomography was used to obtain a cross-sectional image of the subjects' legs at mid-thigh level, measured as the mid-point between the greater trochanter and upper border of the patella. The cross-sectional area of the knee-extensor muscles was determined from the image obtained by computer-based planimetry. The subjects' height and weight were measured. An estimate of body fat content was obtained from measurements of skinfold thicknesses and used to calculate lean body mass. Male subjects were taller (P less than 0.001), heavier (P less than 0.001), leaner (P less than 0.001) and stronger (P less than 0.001) than the female subjects. No significant correlation was found to exist between strength of the knee-extensor muscles and body weight in the male or in the female subjects. In the male subjects, but not in the female group, there was a positive correlation (r = 0.50; P less than 0.01) between strength and lean body mass. Muscle cross-sectional area of the male subjects was greater than that of the female subjects (P less than 0.001). The ratio of strength to cross-sectional area for the male was 9.49 +/- 1.34 (mean +/- S.D.). This is greater but not significantly so, than that for females (8.92 +/- 1.11). In both male and female groups, there was a significant (P less than 0.01) positive correlation between muscle strength and cross-sectional area. A wide variation in the ratio of strength to muscle cross-sectional area was observed. This variability may be a result of anatomical differences between subjects or may result from differences in the proportions of different fibre types in the muscles. The variation between subjects is such that strength is not a useful predictive index of muscle cross-sectional area.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Anterior Acromioplasty for the Chronic Impingement Syndrome in the Shoulder

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder.

              The roentgenographic parameters of motion in normal and abnormal shoulders, including the movement of the scapula, arm angle, glenohumeral angle, scapulothoracic angle, excursion of the humeral head, and instant center of motion for abduction in the plane of the scapula, were determined in twelve normal subjects and fifteen patients. The scapula rotated externally with abduction. The ratio of glenohumeral to scapulothoracic movement was 5:4 after about 30 degrees of abduction. The center of rotation of the glenohumeral joint for abduction in the plane of the scapula was located within six millimeters of the geometric center of the humeral ball. The average excursion of the humeral ball on the face of the glenoid in the superoinferior plane between each 30-degree arc of motion was less than 1.5 millimeters in normal subjects. Significant previous injury resulting in abnormal mechanics of the shoulder joint was associated with abnormal values for excursion of the instant center and of the humeral head. An abnormal glenohumeral-to-scapulothoracic ratio was associated with significant pain in the shoulder. The fact that these various parameters were sensitive indicators of normal and abnormal motion raises the possibility of diagnostic clinical application.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The American Journal of Sports Medicine
                Am J Sports Med
                SAGE Publications
                0363-5465
                1552-3365
                April 23 2016
                May 1995
                April 23 2016
                May 1995
                : 23
                : 3
                : 270-275
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
                Article
                10.1177/036354659502300303
                7661251
                a4acaf64-d34d-4e71-ad46-d1aee2a1ebf8
                © 1995

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article