18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Engineering Specificity and Function of Therapeutic Regulatory T Cells

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adoptive therapy with polyclonal regulatory T cells (Tregs) has shown efficacy in suppressing detrimental immune responses in experimental models of autoimmunity and transplantation. The lack of specificity is a potential limitation of Treg therapy, as studies in mice have demonstrated that specificity can enhance the therapeutic potency of Treg. We will discuss that vectors encoding T cell receptors or chimeric antigen receptors provide an efficient gene-transfer platform to reliably produce Tregs of defined antigen specificity, thus overcoming the considerable difficulties of isolating low-frequency, antigen-specific cells that may be present in the natural Treg repertoire. The recent observations that Tregs can polarize into distinct lineages similar to the Th1, Th2, and Th17 subsets described for conventional T helper cells raise the possibility that Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-driven pathology may require matching Treg subsets for optimal therapeutic efficacy. In the future, genetic engineering may serve not only to enforce FoxP3 expression and a stable Treg phenotype but it may also enable the expression of particular transcription factors that drive differentiation into defined Treg subsets. Together, established and recently developed gene transfer and editing tools provide exciting opportunities to produce tailor-made antigen-specific Treg products with defined functional activities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PPARγ is a major driver of the accumulation and phenotype of adipose-tissue Treg cells

          Obesity and type-2 diabetes (T2D) have increased dramatically over the past several decades, in parallel. One of the major links between these two disorders is chronic, low-grade inflammation 1 . Prolonged nutrient excess promotes the accumulation and activation of leukocytes in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and ultimately other tissues, which provokes metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance, T2D and fatty-liver disease. While invasion of VAT by pro-inflammatory macrophages is considered to be a key event driving adipose-tissue inflammation and insulin resistance, little is known about the roles of other immune-system cell-types in these processes. Recently, a unique population of VAT-resident regulatory T cells (Tregs) was implicated in control of the inflammatory state of adipose tissue and, thereby, insulin sensitivity 2 . We have identified peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), the “master-regulator” of adipocyte differentiation, as a critical molecular orchestrator of VAT Treg accumulation, phenotype and function. Unexpectedly, PPARγ expression by VAT Tregs was necessary for complete restoration of insulin sensitivity in obese mice by the thiazolidinedione (TZD) drug, pioglitazone (Pio). These findings suggest a previously unknown cellular mechanism for this important class of T2D drugs, and provide proof-of-principle that discrete populations of Tregs with unique functions can be precisely targeted to therapeutic ends.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression.

            Foxp3(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells control all aspects of the immune response. Here, I will review the in vitro model systems that have been developed to define the mechanisms used by Treg cells to suppress a large number of distinct target cell types. These mechanisms can be broadly divided into those that target T cells (suppressor cytokines, IL-2 consumption, cytolysis) and those that primarily target antigen-presenting cells (decreased costimulation or decreased antigen presentation). Although multiple mechanisms for Treg cell suppression have been shown in vitro, it is unclear whether the same or different mechanisms are used by Treg cells in vivo. An increase in our understanding of Treg cell suppressor mechanisms will offer an insight into how Treg cell function can be manipulated either positively or negatively in vivo.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              T cell receptor stimulation-induced epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression are independent and complementary events required for Treg cell development.

              The transcription factor Foxp3 is essential for the development of regulatory T (Treg) cells, yet its expression is insufficient for establishing the Treg cell lineage. Here we showed that Treg cell development was achieved by the combination of two independent processes, i.e., the expression of Foxp3 and the establishment of Treg cell-specific CpG hypomethylation pattern. Both events were induced by T cell receptor stimulation. The Treg cell-type CpG hypomethylation began in the thymus and continued to proceed in the periphery and could be fully established without Foxp3. The hypomethylation was required for Foxp3(+) T cells to acquire Treg cell-type gene expression, lineage stability, and full suppressive activity. Thus, those T cells in which the two events have concurrently occurred are developmentally set into the Treg cell lineage. This model explains how Treg cell fate and plasticity is controlled and can be exploited to generate functionally stable Treg cells. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                10 November 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 1517
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, UCL Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, Royal Free Hospital , London, United Kingdom
                [2] 2School of Applied Science, Edinburgh Napier University , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Christine Happle, Hannover Medical School, Germany

                Reviewed by: David William Scott, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, United States; Raymond John Steptoe, The University of Queensland, Australia

                *Correspondence: Hans J. Stauss, h.stauss@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Immunological Tolerance and Regulation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2017.01517
                5686054
                29176976
                a4d13b81-9f86-46c9-8c7b-7bc40bbf1e79
                Copyright © 2017 McGovern, Wright and Stauss.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 June 2017
                : 26 October 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 6, Words: 4666
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100004440
                Funded by: Bloodwise 10.13039/501100007903
                Funded by: Medical Research Council 10.13039/501100000265
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK 10.13039/501100000289
                Categories
                Immunology
                Mini Review

                Immunology
                regulatory t cells,gene therapy,immunotherapy,chimeric antigen receptor,t cell receptor,autoimmunity

                Comments

                Comment on this article