0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Frequency and Causes of False-Positive Elevated Plasma Concentrations of Fasting Gut Hormones in a Specialist Neuroendocrine Tumor Center

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          In the UK, the fasting plasma concentrations of a panel of gut hormones (comprising vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), gastrin, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), glucagon, somatostatin and chromogranin A) are measured to evaluate patients who have or who (due to unexplained and compatible symptoms) are suspected of having neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). False positive elevated hormone concentrations are sometimes found.

          Objective

          To evaluate the frequency and implications of false positive fasting gut hormone results.

          Methods

          Retrospective audit of fasting gut hormone profile results at a large UK university teaching hospital over 12 months.

          Results

          Fasting gut hormone concentrations were measured in 231 patients during 2017. No NETs were found in the 88 patients who had this test performed only to investigate symptoms. 31 false positive gastrin, 8 false positive chromogranin A, two false positive glucagon, three false positive somatostatin, one false positive PP, and one false positive VIP results were found. We extended the audit for glucagon and somatostatin for an additional two years and found seven probable false-positive raised glucagon concentrations and four probable false-positive elevated plasma somatostatin concentrations in total.

          Conclusions

          False-positive elevations of plasma gastrin and chromogranin A were common and causes such as proton pump inhibitor use or inadequate fasting accounted for most cases. Elevated plasma concentrations of the other gut hormones were also detected in patients who had no other evidence of NET. Other diagnoses (e.g. cirrhosis and medullary thyroid carcinoma for hypersomatostatinemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, liver or renal impairment for hyperglucagonemia) may cause these false positive results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States.

          The incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are thought to be rising, but updated epidemiologic data are lacking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of dysregulated glucagon secretion in type 2 diabetes.

              Excessive production of glucose by the liver contributes to fasting and postprandial hyperglycaemia, hallmarks of type 2 diabetes. A central feature of this pathologic response is insufficient hepatic insulin action, due to a combination of insulin resistance and impaired β-cell function. However, a case can be made that glucagon also plays a role in dysregulated hepatic glucose production and abnormal glucose homeostasis. Plasma glucagon concentrations are inappropriately elevated in diabetic individuals, and α-cell suppression by hyperglycaemia is blunted. Experimental evidence suggests that this contributes to greater rates of hepatic glucose production in the fasting state and attenuated reduction after meals. Recent studies in animal models indicate that reduction of glucagon action can have profound effects to mitigate hyperglycaemia even in the face of severe hypoinsulinaemia. While there are no specific treatments for diabetic patients yet available that act specifically on the glucagon signalling pathway, newer agents including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors reduce plasma glucagon and this is thought to contribute to their action to lower blood glucose. The α-cell and glucagon receptor remain tempting targets for novel diabetes treatments, but it is important to understand the magnitude of benefit new strategies would provide as preclinical models suggest that chronic interference with glucagon action could entail adverse effects as well. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1054694
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/416682
                Journal
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front. Endocrinol.
                Frontiers in Endocrinology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2392
                16 December 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 606264
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 School of Medicine, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Insitute of Lifecourse and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [3] 3 ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [4] 4 Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Penelope Dawn Ottewell, The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Johannes Hofland, Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands; Christian Albert Koch, Fox Chase Cancer Center, United States

                *Correspondence: D. Mark Pritchard, mark.pritchard@ 123456liverpool.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Cancer Endocrinology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

                Article
                10.3389/fendo.2020.606264
                7774602
                33391185
                a4d331a6-9192-4fd5-b641-a5b328592012
                Copyright © 2020 Butler, Mekhael, Ahmed, Cuthbertson and Pritchard

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 September 2020
                : 16 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 8, Words: 4566
                Categories
                Endocrinology
                Original Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                gut hormones,somatostatin,glucagon,neuroendocrine neoplasia,false positive

                Comments

                Comment on this article