72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The centrality of temperament to the research domain criteria (RDoC): The earliest building blocks of psychopathology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The research domain criteria (RDoC) is an innovative approach designed to explore dimensions of human behavior. The aim of this approach is to move beyond the limits of psychiatric categories in the hope of aligning the identification of psychological health and dysfunction with clinical neuroscience. Despite its contributions to adult psychopathology research, RDoC undervalues ontogenetic development, which circumscribes our understanding of the etiologies, trajectories, and maintaining mechanisms of psychopathology risk. In this paper, we argue that integrating temperament research into the RDoC framework will advance our understanding of the mechanistic origins of psychopathology beginning in infancy. In illustrating this approach, we propose the incorporation of core principles of temperament theories into a new “life span considerations” subsection as one option for infusing development into the RDoC matrix. In doing so, researchers and clinicians may ultimately have the tools necessary to support emotional development and reduce a young child’s likelihood of psychological dysfunction beginning in the first years of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references187

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

            Recent neurophysiological studies reveal that neurons in certain brain structures carry specific signals about past and future rewards. Dopamine neurons display a short-latency, phasic reward signal indicating the difference between actual and predicted rewards. The signal is useful for enhancing neuronal processing and learning behavioral reactions. It is distinctly different from dopamine's tonic enabling of numerous behavioral processes. Neurons in the striatum, frontal cortex, and amygdala also process reward information but provide more differentiated information for identifying and anticipating rewards and organizing goal-directed behavior. The different reward signals have complementary functions, and the optimal use of rewards in voluntary behavior would benefit from interactions between the signals. Addictive psychostimulant drugs may exert their action by amplifying the dopamine reward signal.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.

              This meta-analysis of 172 studies (N = 2,263 anxious,N = 1,768 nonanxious) examined the boundary conditions of threat-related attentional biases in anxiety. Overall, the results show that the bias is reliably demonstrated with different experimental paradigms and under a variety of experimental conditions, but that it is only an effect size of d = 0.45. Although processes requiring conscious perception of threat contribute to the bias, a significant bias is also observed with stimuli outside awareness. The bias is of comparable magnitude across different types of anxious populations (individuals with different clinical disorders, high-anxious nonclinical individuals, anxious children and adults) and is not observed in nonanxious individuals. Empirical and clinical implications as well as future directions for research are discussed. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                8910645
                20550
                Dev Psychopathol
                Dev Psychopathol
                Development and psychopathology
                0954-5794
                1469-2198
                19 March 2023
                December 2021
                25 March 2023
                : 33
                : 5
                : 1584-1598
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, US
                [2 ]Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, US
                Author notes

                Author Contributions. All authors contributed to conceptualization of the manuscript. B. D. Ostlund and S. Myruski drafted the manuscript, with critical revisions provided by K. Buss and K. E. Pérez-Edgar. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

                Author for Correspondence: Brendan Ostlund, The Pennsylvania State University, 267 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA; bdo12@ 123456psu.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-7707
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5692-6126
                Article
                NIHMS1872651
                10.1017/S0954579421000511
                10039756
                34365985
                a4d9fcf0-f29f-40da-8c2a-51285c6dfbe8

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                developmental psychopathology,early childhood,infancy,research domain criteria (rdoc),temperament

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log