7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Implications of Beta-Blockade in Patients With Obstructive Airway Diseases Exposed to Beta-Blockers With Different β1-Adrenoreceptor Selectivity: An Italian Population-Based Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale: Long-term clinical implications of beta-blockade in obstructive airway diseases remains controversial. We investigated if within the first 5 years of treatment patients with heart failure and obstructive airway diseases using non β1-adrenoreceptor selective beta-blockers have an increased risk of being hospitalized for all-causes, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when compared to patient using selective beta-blockers.

          Methods: Carvedilol users were propensity matched 1:1 for co-treatments, age, gender, and year of inclusion in the cohort with metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to compare all causes, COPD, and heart failure hospitalization or the beta-blocker discontinuation between cohorts. For statistically significant associations, we computed the rate difference and the attributable risk.

          Results: Overall, 11,844 patients out of the 51,214 (23.1%) were exposed to carvedilol and 39,370 (76.9%) to metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol. Carvedilol users had a higher hazard for heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.29; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.18–1.40) with 106 (95%CI 76–134; p-value < 0.001) additional cases of heart failure hospitalization per 10000 person-years if compared to metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. In all, 26.8% (95%CI 22.5–30.9%; p-value < 0.001) of heart failure hospitalizations in the study population could be attributed to being exposed to carvedilol. Carvedilol users had a higher hazard (HR 1.06; 95%CI 1.02–1.10) of discontinuing the pharmacological treatment with 131 (95%CI 62–201; p-value < 0.001) additional cases of beta-blocker discontinuation per 10000 person-years metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users. In all, 6.5% (95%CI 3.9–9.0%; p-value < 0.001) of beta-blocker discontinuation could be attributed to being exposed to carvedilol.

          Conclusion: On long-term follow-up period, carvedilol was associated with a higher risk of heart failure hospitalization and discontinuation if compared to metoprolol/bisoprolol/nebivolol users among patients with heart failure and obstructive airway diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score

              Propensity-score matching is increasingly being used to reduce the confounding that can occur in observational studies examining the effects of treatments or interventions on outcomes. We used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the following algorithms for forming matched pairs of treated and untreated subjects: optimal matching, greedy nearest neighbor matching without replacement, and greedy nearest neighbor matching without replacement within specified caliper widths. For each of the latter two algorithms, we examined four different sub-algorithms defined by the order in which treated subjects were selected for matching to an untreated subject: lowest to highest propensity score, highest to lowest propensity score, best match first, and random order. We also examined matching with replacement. We found that (i) nearest neighbor matching induced the same balance in baseline covariates as did optimal matching; (ii) when at least some of the covariates were continuous, caliper matching tended to induce balance on baseline covariates that was at least as good as the other algorithms; (iii) caliper matching tended to result in estimates of treatment effect with less bias compared with optimal and nearest neighbor matching; (iv) optimal and nearest neighbor matching resulted in estimates of treatment effect with negligibly less variability than did caliper matching; (v) caliper matching had amongst the best performance when assessed using mean squared error; (vi) the order in which treated subjects were selected for matching had at most a modest effect on estimation; and (vii) matching with replacement did not have superior performance compared with caliper matching without replacement. © 2013 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                25 October 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1212
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [2] 2Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli” , Naples, Italy
                [3] 3Caserta Local Health Service , Caserta, Italy
                [4] 4Respiratory Research Unit Zealand, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital , Naestved, Denmark
                [5] 5Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital , Hellerup, Denmark
                [6] 6Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark
                [7] 7Department of Cardiology, North Denmark Regional Hospital , Hjørring, Denmark
                [8] 8Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg, Denmark
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lei Xi, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

                Reviewed by: Chin Moi Chow, University of Sydney, Australia; Federica del Monte, Medical University of South Carolina, United States

                These authors have contributed equally to this work as co-first authors

                These authors have contributed equally to this work as co-lead authors

                This article was submitted to Translational Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2018.01212
                6232895
                30459608
                a50d3378-afcf-449b-baa1-4169b31cbf4b
                Copyright © 2018 Sessa, Mascolo, Scavone, Perone, Di Giorgio, Tari, Fucile, De Angelis, Rasmussen, Jensen, Kragholm, Rossi, Capuano and Sportiello.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 July 2018
                : 05 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                clinical epidemiology,obstructive respiratory diseases,humans,pharmacoepidemiology,pharmacology,beta-blockers,heart failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article