8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Online Temptations: COVID-19 and Religious Misinformation in the MENA Region

      research-article
      ,
      Social Media + Society
      SAGE Publications
      religious misinformation, the MENA region, digital religion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During the coronavirus pandemic, religious misinformation has been found on social media platforms causing fear, confusion, and polluting the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region’s online sphere. Exploring cases of religious clickbait in the form of false hadiths and viral religious advice from religious figures entrenched in the MENA’s political elite, this essay discusses how new dynamics for religion in the age of the Internet are contributing to a uniquely regional and religious form of misinformation. This essay looks at how the phenomenon of religious misinformation is a defining characteristic of the MENA’s online sphere, becoming even more acute during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Medium Is the Message

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Islam and Revolution in the Middle East

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Science and Pseudoscience in Traditional Iranian Medicine.

              The recent efforts for revitalizing traditional Iranian medicine (TIM) have shaped two main streams: The quackery traditional iranian medicine (QTIM) and the academic traditional iranian medicine (ATIM). The QTIM encompasses a wide range of practitioners with various backgrounds who work outside the academic arena and mostly address the public. These practitioners have no solid bases or limited boundaries for their claims. Instead, they rely on making misleading references to the Holy Islamic Scriptures, inducing false hope, claiming miraculous results, appealing to the conspiracy theories, and taking advantage of the public resentment toward some groups of unprofessional healthcare providers. The theories and practices of ATIM, however, can be categorized into two major categories: First, valid and scientific TIM that is aimed to conduct well-designed clinical trials and thereby, supply the evidence-based medicine with new treatments originated in or inspired by TIM. Second, a pseudoscientific part of the current TIM that is based on some obsolete medical theories, especially the medieval humoral medicine, and erroneous accounts of human anatomy, physiology, and physiopathology, mostly adopted from the ancient and medieval medical scripts. TIM has recently established some clinical centers for practicing humoral medicine that is partly pseudoscientific and involves significant risks. This paper suggests that the public health sector has a duty to act against the promulgation of medical superstitions by QTIM and the pseudoscientific medical practices of ATIM, and at the same time, support and promote the valid and potentially beneficial research pursued by ATIM aimed to explore the rich recourses of TIM and thereby enrich the evidence-based medicine.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Soc Media Soc
                Soc Media Soc
                SMS
                spsms
                Social Media + Society
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2056-3051
                30 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 6
                : 3
                : 2056305120948251
                Affiliations
                [1-2056305120948251]University of Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Mahsa Alimardani, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 1 St Giles’, Oxford OX1 3JS, UK. Email: mahsa.alimardani@ 123456oii.ox.ac.uk
                [*]

                Authors appear in alphabetical order.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-6582
                Article
                10.1177_2056305120948251
                10.1177/2056305120948251
                7399566
                34192037
                a5151215-9620-41ee-a1a8-5d93a7d8938c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                2K: Covid19
                Custom metadata
                July-September 2020
                ts1

                religious misinformation,the mena region,digital religion

                Comments

                Comment on this article