19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Inhibition of PDE3, PDE4 and PDE7 potentiates glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and overcomes glucocorticoid resistance in CEM T leukemic cells

      , , , ,
      Biochemical Pharmacology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stimulation of the cAMP signaling pathway has been shown to induce apoptosis and augment the effects of glucocorticoids in inducing apoptosis in leukemic cells. We recently reported that in primary B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemic (B-CLL) cells, apoptosis could be induced by stimulating the cAMP signaling pathway with a phosphodiesterase4 (PDE4) inhibitor alone; while in contrast, in the CEM T leukemic cell line, PDE4 inhibitors alone were ineffective, and concurrent stimulation of adenylyl cyclase was required to see effects [Tiwari et al. (2005)]. We report here that in the CEM and Jurkat T leukemic cell lines, the most abundantly expressed PDEs are PDE3B, PDE4A, PDE4D, PDE7A, and PDE8A. Selective inhibition of PDE3, PDE4 or PDE7 alone produces little effect on cell viability, but inhibition of all three of these PDEs together dramatically enhances glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in CEM cells, and overcomes glucocorticoid resistance in a glucocorticoid-resistant CEM cell line. These studies indicate that for some leukemic cell types, a desired therapeutic effect may be achieved by inhibiting more than one form of PDE.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biochemical Pharmacology
          Biochemical Pharmacology
          Elsevier BV
          00062952
          February 2010
          February 2010
          : 79
          : 3
          : 321-329
          Article
          10.1016/j.bcp.2009.09.001
          19737543
          a5347828-2693-4538-9e8f-a24976b684fe
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article