25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of point-of-care tests for cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis in Kabul, Afghanistan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Kabul (Afghanistan) is a major focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania tropica. Microscopy remains the reference test for diagnosis despite its low performance. We evaluated whether Loopamp™ Leishmania Detection Kit (Loopamp) and CL Detect™ Rapid Test (CL Detect), detecting Leishmania DNA and antigen, respectively could improve CL diagnosis.

          Methods

          A diagnostic accuracy study with prospective inclusion was conducted in a leishmaniasis reference clinic in Kabul. Slit skin samples from CL suspects were analysed by microscopy. Samples taken with a dental broach were tested with CL Detect, Loopamp, and PCR. All samples were transferred to the Academic Medical Center (AMC, the Netherlands) for PCR and Loopamp analyses. The diagnostic performance of the tests was evaluated against a reference combining microscopy and PCR.

          Findings

          274 CL suspects were included in the study. In Kabul, CL Detect had a 65·4% sensitivity [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 59.2–71.2%] and a 100% specificity [95% CI: 80.5–100%], while these were 87.6% [95%CI: 82.9–91.3%] and 70.6% [95% CI: 44.0–89.7%] for Loopamp. At AMC the Loopamp's sensitivity (92.2% [95% CI: 88.2–95.2%]) and specificity (94.1% [95% CI: 71.3–99.8%]) were higher. An algorithm where CL Detect negative suspects would be tested by Loopamp yielded a 93.4% sensitivity [95% CI: 89.6–96.1%] and a 94.1% specificity [95% CI: 71.3–99.8%] when Loopamp's performance at AMC was used.

          Interpretation

          The high specificity of CL Detect and the performance of Loopamp allow their use in a diagnostic algorithm that would minimize the number of CL patients referred for confirmation.

          Fund

          Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects.

          Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a newly developed gene amplification method, combines rapidity, simplicity, and high specificity. Several tests have been developed based on this method, and simplicity is maintained throughout all steps, from extraction of nucleic acids to detection of amplification. In the LAMP reaction, samples are amplified at a fixed temperature through a repetition of two types of elongation reactions occurring at the loop regions: self-elongation of templates from the stem loop structure formed at the 3'-terminal and the binding and elongation of new primers to the loop region. The LAMP reaction has a wide range of possible applications, including point-of-care testing, genetic testing in resource-poor settings (such as in developing countries), and rapid testing of food products and environmental samples.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular diagnosis of leishmaniasis: current status and future applications.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of PCR assays for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

              Three PCR assays for diagnosing leishmaniasis were compared and validated against parasite cultures and microscopic evaluation of stained tissue smears using 92 specimens from suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Israel and the West Bank. Samples from imported and locally acquired disease were examined. The kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) PCR showed the highest sensitivity (98.7%) of any assay, correctly diagnosing 77/78 of the confirmed positive samples, followed by the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) PCR (71/78 positive, 91.0% sensitivity) and then the spliced leader mini-exon PCR (42/78 positive, 53.8% sensitivity). Either parasite culture or microscopy alone detected 62.8% (49/78) or 74.4% (58/78) of the positive specimens, respectively, while culture and microscopy together improved overall sensitivity to 83.3% (65/78). Except for the kDNA PCR that had six false positives, all other assays were 100% specific. Further, restriction enzyme analysis of the ITS1 PCR product enabled identification of 74.6% of the positive samples, which included strains of Leishmania major (50.9%), Leishmania tropica (47.2%), and the Leishmania braziliensis complex (1.9%). This suggests that a PCR using kDNA should be used for the diagnosis of CL and that an ITS1 PCR can be reliably used for the diagnosis of CL when rapid species identification is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                02 November 2018
                November 2018
                02 November 2018
                : 37
                : 453-460
                Affiliations
                [a ]Health Works (Formerly HealthNet TPO), Lizzy Ansinghstraat 163, 1072 RG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]National Malaria and Leishmaniasis Control Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Darul Aman Road, Sanatoriam Street, Kabul, Afghanistan
                [c ]Health Protection and Research Organization, Darul Aman Road, Sanatoriam Street, Kabul, Afghanistan
                [d ]ORDiagnostics SASU, 10Rue Irénée Blanc, 75020 Paris, France
                [e ]Health Works (Formerly HealthNet TPO), Kabul, Afghanistan
                [f ]Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Parasitology Unit, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [g ]Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. isra.cruz@ 123456finddx.org
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S2352-3964(18)30483-3
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.063
                6286266
                30396855
                a53e3798-5839-4aaa-ac5b-cf8df606906a
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 August 2018
                : 1 October 2018
                : 25 October 2018
                Categories
                Research paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article