5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The amb2 locus from Serratia entomophila confers anti-feeding effect on larvae of Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

      ,
      Gene
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Serratia entomophila (Se) causes amber disease in the soil-dwelling pest, Costelytra zealandica (Cz). The disease presents two main signs: anti-feeding effect (AFE) and development of amber coloration (AC). To identify the genetic loci involved in pathogenicity, non-pathogenic (Path-) Se mutants were created by transposon (TnphoA) mutagenesis [Upadhyaya et al., J. Bacteriol. 174 (1992) 1020-1028]. The mutant UC24 lost the ability to produce amber disease signs and it was shown to contain a single TnphoA insertion. The TnphoA insertion site was mapped in a 5.3-kb DNA fragment, which was named amb2 locus. Cosmids containing amb2 fully restored AFE and partially restored AC in UC24. Escherichia coli (Ec) HB101 bearing the amb2 locus was able to cause AFE in a multiple-dose bioassay. SDS-PAGE analysis of the amb2 gene products produced in minicells showed the synthesis of two proteins of 16 and 19.5 kDa, named AnfA and AnfB. The genes encoding these proteins were mapped by deletion analysis. Pathogenicity tests with insect larvae fed with bacteria carrying the anfA and anfB gene regions separately showed that both regions are essential for AFE. It is proposed that the AnfA and AnfB proteins are virulence factors (toxin-like proteins) causing AFE in Cz.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Gene
          Gene
          Elsevier BV
          03781119
          January 1996
          January 1996
          : 172
          : 1
          : 75-79
          Article
          10.1016/0378-1119(96)00055-8
          8654995
          a5451093-623d-4d3f-85f3-4b5bf0e2be00
          © 1996

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article