44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combined Effects of Ventilation Mode and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Mechanics, Gas Exchange and the Epithelium in Mice with Acute Lung Injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The accepted protocol to ventilate patients with acute lung injury is to use low tidal volume (V T) in combination with recruitment maneuvers or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, an important aspect of mechanical ventilation has not been considered: the combined effects of PEEP and ventilation modes on the integrity of the epithelium. Additionally, it is implicitly assumed that the best PEEP-V T combination also protects the epithelium. We aimed to investigate the effects of ventilation mode and PEEP on respiratory mechanics, peak airway pressures and gas exchange as well as on lung surfactant and epithelial cell integrity in mice with acute lung injury. HCl-injured mice were ventilated at PEEPs of 3 and 6 cmH 2O with conventional ventilation (CV), CV with intermittent large breaths (CV LB) to promote recruitment, and a new mode, variable ventilation, optimized for mice (VV N). Mechanics and gas exchange were measured during ventilation and surfactant protein (SP)-B, proSP-B and E-cadherin levels were determined from lavage and lung homogenate. PEEP had a significant effect on mechanics, gas exchange and the epithelium. The higher PEEP reduced lung collapse and improved mechanics and gas exchange but it also down regulated surfactant release and production and increased epithelial cell injury. While CV LB was better than CV, VV N outperformed CV LB in recruitment, reduced epithelial injury and, via a dynamic mechanotransduction, it also triggered increased release and production of surfactant. For long-term outcome, selection of optimal PEEP and ventilation mode may be based on balancing lung physiology with epithelial injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

          In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, massive alveolar collapse and cyclic lung reopening and overdistention during mechanical ventilation may perpetuate alveolar injury. We determined whether a ventilatory strategy designed to minimize such lung injuries could reduce not only pulmonary complications but also mortality at 28 days in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. We randomly assigned 53 patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (including 28 described previously), all of whom were receiving identical hemodynamic and general support, to conventional or protective mechanical ventilation. Conventional ventilation was based on the strategy of maintaining the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for acceptable oxygenation, with a tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of body weight and normal arterial carbon dioxide levels (35 to 38 mm Hg). Protective ventilation involved end-expiratory pressures above the lower inflection point on the static pressure-volume curve, a tidal volume of less than 6 ml per kilogram, driving pressures of less than 20 cm of water above the PEEP value, permissive hypercapnia, and preferential use of pressure-limited ventilatory modes. After 28 days, 11 of 29 patients (38 percent) in the protective-ventilation group had died, as compared with 17 of 24 (71 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group (P<0.001). The rates of weaning from mechanical ventilation were 66 percent in the protective-ventilation group and 29 percent in the conventional-ventilation group (P=0.005): the rates of clinical barotrauma were 7 percent and 42 percent, respectively (P=0.02), despite the use of higher PEEP and mean airway pressures in the protective-ventilation group. The difference in survival to hospital discharge was not significant; 13 of 29 patients (45 percent) in the protective-ventilation group died in the hospital, as compared with 17 of 24 in the conventional-ventilation group (71 percent, P=0.37). As compared with conventional ventilation, the protective strategy was associated with improved survival at 28 days, a higher rate of weaning from mechanical ventilation, and a lower rate of barotrauma in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation was not associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

            Low-tidal-volume ventilation reduces mortality in critically ill patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Instituting additional strategies to open collapsed lung tissue may further reduce mortality. To compare an established low-tidal-volume ventilation strategy with an experimental strategy based on the original "open-lung approach," combining low tidal volume, lung recruitment maneuvers, and high positive-end-expiratory pressure. Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded data analysis conducted between August 2000 and March 2006 in 30 intensive care units in Canada, Australia, and Saudi Arabia. Nine hundred eighty-three consecutive patients with acute lung injury and a ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction not exceeding 250. The control strategy included target tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau airway pressures not exceeding 30 cm H2O, and conventional levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (n = 508). The experimental strategy included target tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressures not exceeding 40 cm H2O, recruitment maneuvers, and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (n = 475). All-cause hospital mortality. Eighty-five percent of the 983 study patients met criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome at enrollment. Tidal volumes remained similar in the 2 groups, and mean positive end-expiratory pressures were 14.6 (SD, 3.4) cm H2O in the experimental group vs 9.8 (SD, 2.7) cm H2O among controls during the first 72 hours (P < .001). All-cause hospital mortality rates were 36.4% and 40.4%, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.05; P = .19). Barotrauma rates were 11.2% and 9.1% (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75; P = .33). The experimental group had lower rates of refractory hypoxemia (4.6% vs 10.2%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.86; P = .01), death with refractory hypoxemia (4.2% vs 8.9%; RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.93; P = .03), and previously defined eligible use of rescue therapies (5.1% vs 9.3%; RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.99; P = .045). For patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, a multifaceted protocolized ventilation strategy designed to recruit and open the lung resulted in no significant difference in all-cause hospital mortality or barotrauma compared with an established low-tidal-volume protocolized ventilation strategy. This "open-lung" strategy did appear to improve secondary end points related to hypoxemia and use of rescue therapies. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182195.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanical ventilation affects local and systemic cytokines in an animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

              We examined the hypothesis that injurious ventilatory strategies (large tidal volume [VT] and/or low positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) would increase release of inflammatory mediators into the lung and into the systemic circulation in a lung injury model. Lung injury was induced in 40 anesthetized paralyzed Sprague-Dawley rats (350 +/- 2 g) by hydrochloric acid instillation (pH 1.5, 2.5 ml/kg). Rats were then randomized into five groups (n = 8): (1) high-volume zero PEEP (HVZP): VT, 16 ml/ kg; (2) high-volume PEEP (HVP): VT, 16 ml/kg, PEEP, 5 cm H2O; (3) low-volume zero PEEP (LVZP): VT, 9 ml/kg; (4) low-volume PEEP (LVP): VT, 9 ml/kg, PEEP, 5 cm H2O; (5) same settings as (4) plus a recruitment maneuver performed every hour (LVPR). Respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain normocapnia and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) was 1. Cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha] and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 [MIP-2]) were measured by ELISA. All animals in the LVZP group died before the end of the experiment. After 4 h of ventilation, the HVZP group had similar lung fluid TNF-alpha concentrations compared with the HVP group: 1,861 +/- 333 pg/ml versus 1,259 +/- 189 pg/ml; and much higher serum concentrations: 692 +/- 74 pg/ml versus 102 +/- 31 pg/ml (p < 0.05). An identical pattern was found for MIP-2. These results suggest that the particular ventilatory strategy can affect the release of cytokines into the systemic circulation, a finding that may have relevance for the development of multisystem organ failure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                9 January 2013
                : 8
                : 1
                : e53934
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                University of Adelaide, Australia
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: BS AT. Performed the experiments: AT HH EB. Analyzed the data: AT HH EB BS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AT EB. Wrote the paper: AT BS.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-31268
                10.1371/journal.pone.0053934
                3541132
                23326543
                a556d87e-7860-4c33-9190-f3bd2bf5acca
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 October 2012
                : 7 December 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                This study was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) HL-098976. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Model Organisms
                Animal Models
                Mouse
                Engineering
                Bioengineering
                Biomedical Engineering
                Medicine
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Respiratory Failure
                Ventilatory Support
                Pulmonology
                Ventilatory Support
                Physics
                Biophysics
                Biomechanics
                Cell Mechanics
                Tissue Mechanics
                Medical Physics

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article