11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of the Swiss Diagnosis-Related Group Reimbursement System With Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Adult Patients

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , PhD, MPA 3 , , MD, MPH 1 , 4 , , MD 1 , 4
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is the implementation of the Swiss diagnosis-related group reimbursement system associated with a reduction in length of hospital stay without negatively affecting in-hospital mortality and readmission rates in adult patients?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of data from 2 426 722 adult patients, the gradual decrease in length of hospital stay observed from 2009 to 2015 was not substantially greater after the implementation of the Swiss diagnosis-related group system in 2012. An increase in 30-day readmission rates and a decrease in in-hospital mortality were observed after the introduction of the Swiss diagnosis-related group system.

          Meaning

          Swiss diagnosis-related group implementation appeared to be associated with higher readmission rates and lower in-hospital mortality but not with a substantial decrease in length of hospital stays.

          Abstract

          Importance

          In 2012, hospital reimbursement in Switzerland changed from a fee-for-service per diem system to a diagnosis-related group (SwissDRG) system. Whether this change in reimbursement is associated with harmful implications for quality of care and patient outcomes remains unclear.

          Objective

          To examine the association of the SwissDRG implementation with length of hospital stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates in the overall adult inpatient population and stratified by 5 individual diagnoses.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study used administrative data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office to investigate medical hospitalizations in Switzerland from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2015. All hospitalizations for adult medical inpatients were included in the main analysis. Patients who presented with 1 of the 5 common medical diagnoses were included in the subanalyses: community-acquired pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, and pulmonary embolism. An interrupted time series model was used to determine changes in time trends for risk-adjusted LOS, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission after the implementation of SwissDRG in 2012. Analyses were performed from March 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018, and from November 1, 2018, to December 18, 2018.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Monthly patient-level data for LOS, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates.

          Results

          The sample included a total of 2 426 722 hospitalized adult patients. Of this total, 1 018 404 patients (41.9%; 531 226 [52.2%] male, median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 69 [55-80] years) composed the before-SwissDRG period; 1 408 318 patients (58.0%; 730 228 [51.9%] male, median [IQR] age of 70 [56-81] years) composed the after-SwissDRG period. The overall LOS gradually decreased from unadjusted mean (SD) 8.0 (12.7) days in 2009 to 7.2 (17.3) days in 2015. This reduction in LOS, however, was not substantially greater with the implementation of SwissDRG in 2012 (risk-adjusted slope, –0.0166 days; 95% CI, –0.0223 to –0.0110 days), with an adjusted difference in slopes of 0.0000 days (95% CI, –0.0072 to 0.0072 days). Risk-adjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality declined from 4.9% in 2009 to 4.6% in 2015, with a substantially greater decline after implementation of SwissDRG (difference between monthly slopes before and after implementation, –0.0115%; 95% CI, –0.0190% to –0.0039%). In the same period, risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates increased from 14.4% in 2009 to 15.0% in 2015, with a greater increase after SwissDRG implementation (change in monthly slope, 0.0339%; 95% CI, 0.0254%-0.0423%). Patients with acute myocardial infarction were found to have a substantially greater increase after SwissDRG implementation in 30-day readmission rates (adjusted difference in slopes, 0.1144%; 95% CI, 0.0617%-0.1671%).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among medical hospitalizations in Switzerland, SwissDRG implementation appeared to be associated with an increase in readmission rates and a decrease in in-hospital mortality but not with the gradual decrease in LOS observed in the historical control period.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines hospitalization and patient outcomes data of hospitalized adult patients before and after the implementation of the diagnosis-related group reimbursement system in Switzerland.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Individual Responsibility and Community Solidarity--The Swiss Health Care System.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

            Background Activity-based funding (ABF) of hospitals is a policy intervention intended to re-shape incentives across health systems through the use of diagnosis-related groups. Many countries are adopting or actively promoting ABF. We assessed the effect of ABF on key measures potentially affecting patients and health care systems: mortality (acute and post-acute care); readmission rates; discharge rate to post-acute care following hospitalization; severity of illness; volume of care. Methods We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the worldwide evidence produced since 1980. We included all studies reporting original quantitative data comparing the impact of ABF versus alternative funding systems in acute care settings, regardless of language. We searched 9 electronic databases (OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID Healthstar, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Business Source), hand-searched reference lists, and consulted with experts. Paired reviewers independently screened for eligibility, abstracted data, and assessed study credibility according to a pre-defined scoring system, resolving conflicts by discussion or adjudication. Results Of 16,565 unique citations, 50 US studies and 15 studies from 9 other countries proved eligible (i.e. Australia, Austria, England, Germany, Israel, Italy, Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland). We found consistent and robust differences between ABF and no-ABF in discharge to post-acute care, showing a 24% increase with ABF (pooled relative risk  = 1.24, 95% CI 1.18–1.31). Results also suggested a possible increase in readmission with ABF, and an apparent increase in severity of illness, perhaps reflecting differences in diagnostic coding. Although we found no consistent, systematic differences in mortality rates and volume of care, results varied widely across studies, some suggesting appreciable benefits from ABF, and others suggesting deleterious consequences. Conclusions Transitioning to ABF is associated with important policy- and clinically-relevant changes. Evidence suggests substantial increases in admissions to post-acute care following hospitalization, with implications for system capacity and equitable access to care. High variability in results of other outcomes leaves the impact in particular settings uncertain, and may not allow a jurisdiction to predict if ABF would be harmless. Decision-makers considering ABF should plan for likely increases in post-acute care admissions, and be aware of the large uncertainty around impacts on other critical outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: A population-based perspective

              Background Switzerland introduces a DRG (Diagnosis Related Groups) based system for hospital financing in 2012 in order to increase efficiency and transparency of Swiss health care. DRG-based hospital reimbursement is not simultaneously realized in all Swiss cantons and several cantons already implemented DRG-based financing irrespective of the national agenda, a setting that provides an opportunity to compare the situation in different cantons. Effects of introducing DRGs anticipated for providers and insurers are relatively well known but it remains less clear what effects DRGs will have on served populations. The objective of the study is therefore to analyze differences of volume and major quality indicators of care between areas with or without DRG-based hospital reimbursement from a population based perspective. Methods Small area analysis of all hospitalizations in acute care hospitals and of all consultations reimbursed by mandatory basic health insurance for physicians in own practice during 2003-2007. Results The results show fewer hospitalizations and a relocation of resources to outpatient care in areas with DRG reimbursement. Overall burden of disease expressed as per capita DRG cost weights was almost identical between the two types of hospital reimbursement and no distinct temporal differences were detected in this respect. But the results show considerably higher 90-day rehospitalization rates in DRG areas. Conclusion The study provides evidence of both desired and harmful effects related to the implementation of DRGs. Systematic monitoring of outcomes and quality of care are therefore essential elements to maintain in the Swiss health system after DRG's are implemented on a nationwide basis in 2012.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                15 February 2019
                February 2019
                15 February 2019
                : 2
                : 2
                : e188332
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, University Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
                [2 ]Division of Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [3 ]Division of Health and Social Affairs, Section Health, Swiss Federal Office for Statistics, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
                [4 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 21, 2018.
                Published: February 15, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8332
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Kutz A et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Alexander Kutz, MD, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, University Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland ( kutz.alexander@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Kutz and Schuetz had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Kutz, Schuetz, Mueller.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Kutz, Gut, Wagner, Mueller.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kutz, Ebrahimi, Wagner, Schuetz, Mueller.
                Statistical analysis: Kutz, Wagner, Schuetz.
                Obtained funding: Kutz, Schuetz, Mueller.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Kutz, Mueller.
                Supervision: Kutz, Wagner, Schuetz, Mueller.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the sponsor.
                Meeting Presentation: The results of this study were presented in part at the 2017 Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine Meeting; May 30, 2018; Basel, Switzerland.
                Article
                zoi180339
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8332
                6484617
                30768196
                a596dd95-3214-4391-9f64-a71c952858b1
                Copyright 2019 Kutz A et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 29 August 2018
                : 19 December 2018
                : 21 December 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article