1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Underwater photogrammetry for close‐range 3D imaging of dry‐sensitive objects: The case study of cephalopod beaks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • Technical advances in 3D imaging have contributed to quantifying and understanding biological variability and complexity. However, small, dry‐sensitive objects are not easy to reconstruct using common and easily available techniques such as photogrammetry, surface scanning, or micro‐CT scanning. Here, we use cephalopod beaks as an example as their size, thickness, transparency, and dry‐sensitive nature make them particularly challenging. We developed a new, underwater, photogrammetry protocol in order to add these types of biological structures to the panel of photogrammetric possibilities.

          • We used a camera with a macrophotography mode in a waterproof housing fixed in a tank with clear water. The beak was painted and fixed on a colored rotating support. Three angles of view, two acquisitions, and around 300 pictures per specimen were taken in order to reconstruct a full 3D model. These models were compared with others obtained with micro‐CT scanning to verify their accuracy.

          • The models can be obtained quickly and cheaply compared with micro‐CT scanning and have sufficient precision for quantitative interspecific morphological analyses. Our work shows that underwater photogrammetry is a fast, noninvasive, efficient, and accurate way to reconstruct 3D models of dry‐sensitive objects while conserving their shape. While the reconstruction of the shape is accurate, some internal parts cannot be reconstructed with photogrammetry as they are not visible. In contrast, these structures are visible using reconstructions based on micro‐CT scanning. The mean difference between both methods is very small (10 −5 to 10 −4 mm) and is significantly lower than differences between meshes of different individuals.

          • This photogrammetry protocol is portable, easy‐to‐use, fast, and reproducible. Micro‐CT scanning, in contrast, is time‐consuming, expensive, and nonportable. This protocol can be applied to reconstruct the 3D shape of many other dry‐sensitive objects such as shells of shellfish, cartilage, plants, and other chitinous materials.

          Abstract

          We propose a new close‐range underwater photogrammetry protocol adapted to small dry‐sensitive objects. We used cephalopod beaks as a case study because they combine several problems for 3D imaging. The comparison between photogrammetry and microtomography shows a high accuracy of the models reconstructed by photogrammetry, allowing various applications for quantitative analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phenomics: the next challenge.

          A key goal of biology is to understand phenotypic characteristics, such as health, disease and evolutionary fitness. Phenotypic variation is produced through a complex web of interactions between genotype and environment, and such a 'genotype-phenotype' map is inaccessible without the detailed phenotypic data that allow these interactions to be studied. Despite this need, our ability to characterize phenomes - the full set of phenotypes of an individual - lags behind our ability to characterize genomes. Phenomics should be recognized and pursued as an independent discipline to enable the development and adoption of high-throughput and high-dimensional phenotyping.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Screened poisson surface reconstruction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues

              Background Comparative, functional, and developmental studies of animal morphology require accurate visualization of three-dimensional structures, but few widely applicable methods exist for non-destructive whole-volume imaging of animal tissues. Quantitative studies in particular require accurately aligned and calibrated volume images of animal structures. X-ray microtomography (microCT) has the potential to produce quantitative 3D images of small biological samples, but its widespread use for non-mineralized tissues has been limited by the low x-ray contrast of soft tissues. Although osmium staining and a few other techniques have been used for contrast enhancement, generally useful methods for microCT imaging for comparative morphology are still lacking. Results Several very simple and versatile staining methods are presented for microCT imaging of animal soft tissues, along with advice on tissue fixation and sample preparation. The stains, based on inorganic iodine and phosphotungstic acid, are easier to handle and much less toxic than osmium, and they produce high-contrast x-ray images of a wide variety of soft tissues. The breadth of possible applications is illustrated with a few microCT images of model and non-model animals, including volume and section images of vertebrates, embryos, insects, and other invertebrates. Each image dataset contains x-ray absorbance values for every point in the imaged volume, and objects as small as individual muscle fibers and single blood cells can be resolved in their original locations and orientations within the sample. Conclusion With very simple contrast staining, microCT imaging can produce quantitative, high-resolution, high-contrast volume images of animal soft tissues, without destroying the specimens and with possibilities of combining with other preparation and imaging methods. Such images are expected to be useful in comparative, developmental, functional, and quantitative studies of morphology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marjorie.roscian1@edu.mnhn.fr
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                03 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 11
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v11.12 )
                : 7730-7742
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie‐Paris (CR2P) Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle CNRS Sorbonne Université Paris France
                [ 2 ] Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (Mecadev) Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle CNRS Bâtiment d'Anatomie Comparée Paris France
                [ 3 ] Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB) Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle CNRS Sorbonne Université EPHE Université des Antilles Paris France
                [ 4 ] Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé UMR7372 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université Villiers‐en‐Bois France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Marjorie Roscian, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie‐Paris (CR2P), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, 8 rue Buffon, CP 38, 75005 Paris, France.

                Email: marjorie.roscian1@ 123456edu.mnhn.fr

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-082X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9469-9489
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-0416
                Article
                ECE37607
                10.1002/ece3.7607
                8216959
                34188847
                a5a69758-0f03-402f-aded-7da9a08adde3
                © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 April 2021
                : 22 September 2020
                : 07 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 8065
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:21.06.2021

                Evolutionary Biology
                3d models,cephalopod beaks,dry‐sensitive material,micro‐ct scanning,micro‐photogrammetry,underwater photogrammetry

                Comments

                Comment on this article