40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA and Clinical Correlates in Patients with Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Gastric Adenocarcinoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d625376e219">Purpose:</h5> <p id="P3">Esophageal, gastro-esophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma (herein gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas) are associated with poor prognosis and limited systemic treatment options. To further understand the genomic landscape of gastroesophageal cancers and its clinical correlations, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients’ plasma was evaluated using next-generation sequencing (NGS). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d625376e224">Methods:</h5> <p id="P4">We analyzed genomic alterations of 55 patients (mostly advanced disease; nine, surgically resectable) with gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas using clinical-grade NGS performed on plasma-derived ctDNA (54-73 gene panel). The test detects single nucleotide variants, as well as copy number amplifications, fusions and indels in selected genes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d625376e229">Results:</h5> <p id="P5">Seventy-six percent of patients (42/55) had ≥1 genomic alteration (including variants of unknown significance [VUSs]) and 69.1% (38/55) had ≥1 characterized alteration (excluding VUSs). The median number of alterations per patient was 2 (range, 0–15). <i>TP53</i> (50.9%, 28/55), <i>PIK3CA</i> (16.4%, 9/55), <i>ERBB2</i> (14.5%, 8/55) and <i>KRAS</i> (14.5%, 8/55) genes were most frequently affected characterized alterations. Thirty-one patients also had tissue NGS. Concordance between tissue and ctDNA ranged from 61.3% ( <i>TP53</i> alterations) to 87.1% ( <i>KRAS</i> alterations). <i>ERBB2</i> alterations were significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR: 14.06, 95% CI: 2.44 – 81.03, P=0.003 multivariate analysis). Among patients with ≥1 alteration, no two patients had identical molecular portfolios. All patients with ≥1 characterized alteration had theoretically targetable alterations by an FDA-approved agent (on- or off-label). Illustrative case treated with cognate agent is presented. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d625376e256">Conclusions:</h5> <p id="P6">Evaluation of ctDNA by NGS among gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients is feasible. Patients harbored heterogeneous patterns of genomics, with most having alterations that are potentially pharmacologically tractable. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clinical Cancer Research
          Clin Cancer Res
          American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
          1078-0432
          1557-3265
          December 13 2018
          December 15 2018
          December 15 2018
          October 22 2018
          : 24
          : 24
          : 6248-6256
          Article
          10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1128
          6384095
          30348637
          a5e7ab2a-c8f9-4680-a56c-120195a7a447
          © 2018
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article