18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation alone, after radical prostatectomy in high risk prostate cancer Translated title: Radioterapia adjuvante versus vigilância após prostatectomia radical em câncer de próstata de alto risco

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          SummaryObjectives:the authors compared biochemical and clinical outcomes of patients with resected high-risk prostate cancer, managed with adjuvant radiotherapy or observation alone.Methods:patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 1995 and December 2005 at the authors’ department were evaluated. Patients with pT3, with or without positive surgical margins (PSM), were included for analysis. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and follow-up data were recorded. Comparison was made between adjuvant radiotherapy group (AR) and observation alone group (OA). Primary end-point was biochemical progression-free survival.Results:out of 739 patients treated with RP, 49 presented with pT3 with or without PSM. 39 received adjuvant radiotherapy and 10 were observed. Median follow- up was 6.2 years for AR and 7.3 years for OA. Biochemical progression occurred in 12.8%, in AR, and 70%, in OA (p=0.0008). Five-year biochemical progression-free survival was 87.1% in AR and 30% in OA (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03- 0.48 – p<0.0001). Rescue androgen deprivation therapy was needed in 2.6%, in AR, and 30%, in OA (p=0.023).Conclusions:adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer provided better biochemical outcomes. Whether this translates into better clinical progression, it is still unknown.

          Translated abstract

          ResumoObjetivo:comparar resultados clínicos e bioquímicos de pacientes com câncer de próstata de alto risco submetidos à prostatectomia radical, tratados com radioterapia adjuvante (RA) ou vigilância.Métodos:foram avaliados os pacientes tratados com prostatectomia radical, entre janeiro de 1995 e dezembro de 2005. Pacientes que apresentaram pT3, com ou sem margens cirúrgicas positivas, foram incluídos para análise. Foram registrados dados demográficos, clínicos, patológicos e de seguimento. Foram comparados os resultados entre o grupo que recebeu RA e o grupo em vigilância. O desfecho principal avaliado foi a sobrevida livre de progressão bioquímica.Resultados:entre os 739 pacientes tratados com prostatectomia radical, 49 apresentaram tumores pT3, com ou sem margens cirúrgicas positivas. Trinta e nove receberam RA e 10 foram submetidos à vigilância. O seguimento médio foi de 6,2 anos para a RA e de 7,3 anos para a vigilância. Houve progressão bioquímica em 12,8% dos pacientes no grupo RA e em 70%, no grupo da vigilância (p=0,0008). A sobrevida livre de progressão bioquímica em 5 anos foi de 87,1% na RA e 30% na vigilância (HR 0,12, IC95% 0,03-0,48 - p<0,0001). Terapia hormonal de resgate foi necessária em 2,6% dos pacientes na RA e em 30% na vigilância (p=0,023).Conclusões:a radioterapia adjuvante após prostatectomia radical em pacientes com câncer de próstata de alto risco ofereceu melhores resultados bioquímicos. Ainda não está claro se isso se traduz em uma evolução clínica melhor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial.

          Extraprostatic disease will be manifest in a third of men after radical prostatectomy. We present the long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial of radiotherapy to reduce the risk of subsequent metastatic disease and death. A total of 431 men with pT3N0M0 prostate cancer were randomized to 60 to 64 Gy adjuvant radiotherapy or observation. The primary study end point was metastasis-free survival. Of 425 eligible men 211 were randomized to observation and 214 to adjuvant radiation. Of those men under observation 70 ultimately received radiotherapy. Metastasis-free survival was significantly greater with radiotherapy (93 of 214 events on the radiotherapy arm vs 114 of 211 events on observation; HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54, 0.94; p = 0.016). Survival improved significantly with adjuvant radiation (88 deaths of 214 on the radiotherapy arm vs 110 deaths of 211 on observation; HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55, 0.96; p = 0.023). Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for a man with pT3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces the risk of metastasis and increases survival.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results.

            We updated a long-term cancer control outcome in a large anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) series. We also evaluated the perioperative parameters that predict cancer specific outcomes following surgery. From May 1983 to February 2003, 1 surgeon (WJC) performed RRP in 3,478 consecutive men. Patients were followed with semiannual serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests and annual digital rectal examinations. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 10-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival, cancer specific survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine independent perioperative predictors of cancer progression. At a mean followup of 65 months (range 0 to 233) actuarial 10-year biochemical progression-free, cancer specific and overall survival probabilities were 68%, 97% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis biochemical progression-free survival probability was significantly associated with preoperative PSA, clinical tumor stage, Gleason sum, pathological stage and treatment era. Cancer specific survival and overall survival rates were also significantly associated with clinicopathological parameters. RRP can be performed with excellent survival outcomes. Favorable clinicopathological parameters and treatment in the PSA era are associated with improved cancer control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95.

              Local failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) is common in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. Two randomized trials demonstrated an advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) compared with a wait-and-see policy. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare RP followed by immediate RT with RP alone for patients with pT3 prostate cancer and an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after RP. After RP, 192 men were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy, and 193 men were assigned to immediate postoperative RT. Eligible patients had pT3 pN0 tumors. Patients who did not achieve an undetectable PSA after RP were excluded from treatment according to random assignment (n = 78; 20%). Of the remaining 307 patients, 34 patients on the RT arm did not receive RT and five patients on the wait-and-see arm received RT. Therefore, 114 patients underwent RT and 154 patients were treated with a wait-and-see policy. The primary end point was biochemical progression-free survival. Biochemical progression-free survival after 5 years in patients with undetectable PSA after RP was significantly improved in the RT group (72%; 95% CI, 65% to 81%; v 54%, 95% CI, 45% to 63%; hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79; P = .0015). On univariate analysis, Gleason score more than 6 and less than 7, PSA before RP, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins were predictors of outcome. The rate of grade 3 to 4 late adverse effects was 0.3%. Adjuvant RT for pT3 prostate cancer with postoperatively undetectable PSA significantly reduces the risk of biochemical progression. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on metastases-free and overall survival.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                ramb
                Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
                Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.
                Associação Médica Brasileira (São Paulo )
                1806-9282
                August 2015
                : 61
                : 4
                : 324-328
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Hospital Erasto Gaertner Brazil
                [2 ] Hospital Erasto Gaertner Brazil
                [3 ] Hospital Erasto Gaertner Brazil
                [4 ] Hospital Erasto Gaertner Brazil
                Article
                S0104-42302015000400324
                10.1590/1806-9282.61.04.324
                a5f37e06-9627-4587-a398-385f4fd4f26a

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0104-4230&lng=en
                Categories
                MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

                Internal medicine
                prostatic neoplasms,prostatectomy,adjuvant radiotherapy,recurrence,prostatectomia,radioterapia adjuvante,neoplasias da próstata,recidiva

                Comments

                Comment on this article