19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Jamesian Aspects of Misattribution Research

      1
      Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          James's (1884) emotion theory was a precursor of Schachter's (1964) theoretical stance, the viewpoint that formed the basis of subsequent misattribution research. Schachter accepted the Jamesian notion that emotional experience depends on the perception of one's own bodily changes, but he differed from James in assuming that physiological reactions do not inform the individual of hedonic quality. However, several misattribution researchers have implied that hedonic tone can derive immediately from bodily reactions, thereby mixing Jamesian assumptions with Schachter's standpoint. Several pertinent studies are discussed and accommodated within a modified version of Schachter's theory, one which assumes that internal arousal can provide information concerning both the intensity and evaluative quality of affective experience, and that such internal arousal can precede misattribution. Thus, the proposed modification integrates the views of James and Schachter.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.

            There has long been interest in describing emotional experience in terms of underlying dimensions, but traditionally only two dimensions, pleasantness and arousal, have been reliably found. The reasons for these findings are reviewed, and integrating this review with two recent theories of emotions (Roseman, 1984; Scherer, 1982), we propose eight cognitive appraisal dimensions to differentiate emotional experience. In an investigation of this model, subjects recalled past experiences associated with each of 15 emotions, and rated them along the proposed dimensions. Six orthogonal dimensions, pleasantness, anticipated effort, certainty, attentional activity, self-other responsibility/control, and situational control, were recovered, and the emotions varied systematically along each of these dimensions, indicating a strong relation between the appraisal of one's circumstances and one's emotional state. The patterns of appraisal for the different emotions, and the role of each of the dimensions in differentiating emotional experience are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.

              R Zajonc (1980)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
                Pers Soc Psychol Bull
                SAGE Publications
                0146-1672
                1552-7433
                December 1990
                July 02 2016
                December 1990
                : 16
                : 4
                : 652-664
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of St. Thomas
                Article
                10.1177/0146167290164006
                a5f7d285-c86f-4159-ba65-00c8cae32716
                © 1990

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Biochemistry,Animal science & Zoology
                Biochemistry, Animal science & Zoology

                Comments

                Comment on this article