+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Comparison of Adenosine, Dobutamine, and Exercise Radionuclide Ventriculography in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The diagnostic values of adenosine, dobutamine, and exercise radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), and the characteristics of those patients who showed myocardial ischemia during the infusion of adenosine or dobutamine were assessed in 41 patients with suspected CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, for detecting patients with CAD were 35 (p < 0.01 vs. exercise RNVG), 100 and 46% (p < 0.01 vs. exercise RNVG) with adenosine RNVG, 74, 100 and 78% with dobutamine RNVG and 88, 71 and 85% with exercise RNVG. There was a significant difference in physiologic parameters during the provocation of ischemia by adenosine versus exercise RNVG, although these parameters were similar by dobutamine and exercise RNVG. Stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that the number of stenotic vessels was an important and independent predictor for the myocardial ischemia induced by each stress; the peak filling rate was the only predictor for adenosine-induced ischemia. Dobutamine induced myocardial ischemia in a way similar to that of exercise, and was more useful than adenosine for pharmacologic stress RNVG. The mechanism of the adenosine-induced ischemia seemed to differ from that of the ischemia induced by dobutamine or exercise, and to be closely associated with left ventricular diastolic function.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          19 November 2008
          : 88
          : 2
          : 180-188
          aSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Gunma University School of Medicine, bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tano General Hospital, and cCollege of Medical Care and Technology, Gunma University School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
          177327 Cardiology 1997;88:180–188
          © 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Noninvasive and Diagnostic Cardiology


          Comment on this article