29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation 1 (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the published literature and categorized RFR as a “possible” (Group 2B) human carcinogen. A broad range of adverse human health effects associated with RFR have been reported since the IARC review. In addition, three large-scale carcinogenicity studies in rodents exposed to levels of RFR that mimic lifetime human exposures have shown significantly increased rates of Schwannomas and malignant gliomas, as well as chromosomal DNA damage. Of particular concern are the effects of RFR exposure on the developing brain in children. Compared with an adult male, a cell phone held against the head of a child exposes deeper brain structures to greater radiation doses per unit volume, and the young, thin skull's bone marrow absorbs a roughly 10-fold higher local dose. Experimental and observational studies also suggest that men who keep cell phones in their trouser pockets have significantly lower sperm counts and significantly impaired sperm motility and morphology, including mitochondrial DNA damage. Based on the accumulated evidence, we recommend that IARC re-evaluate its 2011 classification of the human carcinogenicity of RFR, and that WHO complete a systematic review of multiple other health effects such as sperm damage. In the interim, current knowledge provides justification for governments, public health authorities, and physicians/allied health professionals to warn the population that having a cell phone next to the body is harmful, and to support measures to reduce all exposures to RFR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work!

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Cell-Phone Addiction: A Review

            We present a review of the studies that have been published about addiction to cell phones. We analyze the concept of cell-phone addiction as well as its prevalence, study methodologies, psychological features, and associated psychiatric comorbidities. Research in this field has generally evolved from a global view of the cell phone as a device to its analysis via applications and contents. The diversity of criteria and methodological approaches that have been used is notable, as is a certain lack of conceptual delimitation that has resulted in a broad spread of prevalent data. There is a consensus about the existence of cell-phone addiction, but the delimitation and criteria used by various researchers vary. Cell-phone addiction shows a distinct user profile that differentiates it from Internet addiction. Without evidence pointing to the influence of cultural level and socioeconomic status, the pattern of abuse is greatest among young people, primarily females. Intercultural and geographical differences have not been sufficiently studied. The problematic use of cell phones has been associated with personality variables, such as extraversion, neuroticism, self-esteem, impulsivity, self-identity, and self-image. Similarly, sleep disturbance, anxiety, stress, and, to a lesser extent, depression, which are also associated with Internet abuse, have been associated with problematic cell-phone use. In addition, the present review reveals the coexistence relationship between problematic cell-phone use and substance use such as tobacco and alcohol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              American Brain Tumor Association Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                13 August 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 223
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [2] 2Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Prevent Cancer Now , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [3] 3Environmental Health Trust , Teton Village, WY, United States
                [4] 4The Environment and Cancer Research Foundation , Örebro, Sweden
                [5] 5School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, ON, Canada
                [6] 6School of Public Health, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB, Canada
                [7] 7Health Research Institute, University of Canberra , Canberra, ACT, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Dariusz Leszczynski, University of Helsinki, Finland

                Reviewed by: Lorenzo Manti, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan, Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, United Arab Emirates

                *Correspondence: Anthony B. Miller ab.miller@ 123456utoronto.ca

                This article was submitted to Radiation and Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223
                6701402
                31457001
                a60de263-c840-48eb-8d5e-2da42eb6eb65
                Copyright © 2019 Miller, Sears, Morgan, Davis, Hardell, Oremus and Soskolne.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 April 2019
                : 25 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 86, Pages: 10, Words: 8233
                Categories
                Public Health
                Review

                brain cancer,electromagnetic hypersensitivity,glioma,non-cancer outcomes,policy recommendations,radiofrequency fields,child development,acoustic neuroma

                Comments

                Comment on this article