1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of sufentanil-midazolam and sevoflurane for anesthesia induction in children undergoing cardiac surgery by real-time hemodynamic and cardiac efficiency monitoring: A prospective randomized study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Intravenous sufentanil-midazolam and inhalational sevoflurane are widely used for anesthetic induction in children undergoing cardiac surgery. However, knowledge about their effects on hemodynamics and cardiac efficiency remains limited due largely to the lack of direct monitoring method. We used minimally invasive technique pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) to directly monitor hemodynamics and cardiac efficiency and compared the effects of the two anesthetic regimens in children undergoing ventricular septal defect repair. Methods Forty-Four children (2.3±0.9 years) were randomly divided into two groups to receive either intravenous sufentanil (1 μg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) (Group SM) or 2.0 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane (Group S) to complete induction after sedation was obtained with 2.0 MAC sevoflurane. Systemic hemodynamic data recorded by PRAM included heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and mean (MBP) blood pressure, stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), the maximal slope of systolic upstroke (dp/dtmax) and cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE) after sedation obtained, 1, 2, 5 min after induction achieved, 1, 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation. Results HR, SVRI showed a decrease in Group SM but an increase in Group S (Ptime*group<0.0001) in the study period. SVI and CCE showed an increase in Group SM but a decrease in Group S (Ptime*group<0.0001). SBP, MBP and CI were related to time after polynomial transformation, and showed an increase after intubation in Group SM but a decrease in Group S (Ptime2*group<0.0001). Conclusion PRAM provides meaningful and direct monitoring of hemodynamics and cardiac efficiency during the dynamic period of anesthetic induction in children undergoing cardiac surgery. As compared to inhalational sevoflurane, intravenous sufentanil-midazolam exerts more favorable effects on systemic hemodynamics and cardiac efficiency during anesthetic induction in this group of patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Heart Surg Forum
          The heart surgery forum
          Carden Jennings Publishing Co.
          1522-6662
          1098-3511
          February 18 2019
          : 22
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Anesthesia, Capital Institute of Pediatrics Affiliated Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China.
          [2 ] Anesthesia Center, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China.
          [3 ] Department of Cardiac Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics Affiliated Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China.
          [4 ] Department of Clinical Physiology Laboratory, Capital Institute of Pediatrics Affiliated Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China.
          Article
          10.1532/hsf.2037
          30802196
          a62851b8-1492-40a1-91fc-d17a6e1b806b
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article