53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.

          The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

              Although current electronic methods of scientific publishing offer increased opportunities for publishing all research studies and describing them in sufficient detail, health research literature still suffers from many shortcomings. These shortcomings seriously undermine the value and utility of the literature and waste scarce resources invested in the research. In recent years there have been several positive steps aimed at improving this situation, such as a strengthening of journals' policies on research publication and the wide requirement to register clinical trials. The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative set up to advance high quality reporting of health research studies; it promotes good reporting practices including the wider implementation of reporting guidelines. EQUATOR provides free online resources http://www.equator-network.org supported by education and training activities and assists in the development of robust reporting guidelines. This paper outlines EQUATOR's goals and activities and offers suggestions for organizations and individuals involved in health research on how to strengthen research reporting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                27 April 2021
                23 April 2021
                23 April 2021
                : 118
                : 17
                : e2103238118
                Affiliations
                [1] aEdinburgh CAMARADES group, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh EH8 9YL, United Kingdom;
                [2] beLife Sciences Publications Ltd. , Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom;
                [3] cJohn Wiley & Sons , Oxford OX4 2DQ, United Kingdom;
                [4] dPublic Library of Science , San Francisco, CA 94111;
                [5] eCenter for Open Science , Charlottesville, VA 22903;
                [6] fNature Portfolio, Springer Nature , New York, NY 10004;
                [7] gCell Press , Cambridge, MA 02139;
                [8] hScience, American Association for the Advancement of Science , Washington, DC 20005
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed: Email: Malcolm.Macleod@ 123456ed.ac.uk (correspondence regarding the development and evaluation of the guideline) or mellor.david@ 123456gmail.com (for further information about implementation and stewardship).

                Author contributions: M.M. performed investigations and formal analysis; D.M. performed data curation; M.M. and D.M. performed methodology; M.M. and D.M. supplied resources; V.K. and S.S. provided project administration; V.K. and S.S. wrote the paper; and M.M., A.M.C., V.K., D.M., S.S., D.S. and V.V. conceptualized the project and edited versions of the paper.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-9839
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9570-2061
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-4333
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-7239
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-5888
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-4910
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-2359
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-473X
                Article
                202103238
                10.1073/pnas.2103238118
                8092464
                33893240
                a63ebd66-d4a2-4222-9196-63e296981789
                Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Categories
                At the National Academies
                422
                Biological Sciences
                Medical Sciences
                Custom metadata
                free

                Comments

                Comment on this article