2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A comparison between self‐reported hand eczema and self‐reported signs and symptoms of skin lesions indicating hand eczema

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The accuracy of self‐reported hand eczema (HE) is currently unclear, and it is unknown how well self‐reported signs and symptoms of skin lesions that indicate HE correlate with self‐reported HE.

          Objectives

          To correlate self‐reported signs and symptoms of skin lesions on the hands with self‐reported HE, to assess the sensitivity and specificity, and to suggest a definition for HE.

          Method

          Seven hundred ninety‐five (47.8%) of 1663 invited healthcare workers completed a digital questionnaire, and were asked to report if they experienced HE or any of the following skin signs/symptoms in past 11 months: scaling, erythema, fissures, vesicles, dryness, itch, stinging.

          Results

          HE during the past 11 months was reported by 11.9%. Of these, 91.4% reported at least one skin sign versus 32.3% of those without self‐reported HE. The highest sensitivity and specificity were found for erythema (77.4% and 78.2%, respectively) and itch (78.5% and 78.6%, respectively), both separately and combined. The combination of ≥2 signs (erythema, scaling, fissures and vesicles) and itch, reached a sensitivity of 52.7% and specificity of 93.9%.

          Conclusion

          The marked difference between self‐reported HE and signs/symptoms highlights the importance of differentiating between data based on self‐reported HE and signs/symptoms. As a first step towards diagnostic HE criteria, ≥2 signs combined with itch could be considered, but clinical studies are needed to verify the precision.

          Abstract

          In this study, self‐reported skin signs and symptoms were evaluated in participants with and without self‐reported hand eczema. Hand eczema was reported by 11.9%, and in this group 91.4% reported at least one sign versus 32.3% of those without self‐reported hand eczema. The combination of ≥2 signs (erythema, scaling, fissures and vesicles) and itch reached a sensitivity of 52.7% and specificity of 93.9% and may be regarded as a first step in the direction towards a standardized set of diagnostic criteria for hand eczema.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice

          Within the context of screening tests, it is important to avoid misconceptions about sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. In this article, therefore, foundations are first established concerning these metrics along with the first of several aspects of pliability that should be recognized in relation to those metrics. Clarification is then provided about the definitions of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values and why researchers and clinicians can misunderstand and misrepresent them. Arguments are made that sensitivity and specificity should usually be applied only in the context of describing a screening test’s attributes relative to a reference standard; that predictive values are more appropriate and informative in actual screening contexts, but that sensitivity and specificity can be used for screening decisions about individual people if they are extremely high; that predictive values need not always be high and might be used to advantage by adjusting the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests; that, in screening contexts, researchers should provide information about all four metrics and how they were derived; and that, where necessary, consumers of health research should have the skills to interpret those metrics effectively for maximum benefit to clients and the healthcare system.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The U.K. Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation.

            In order to qualify as a case of atopic dermatitis, we propose that an individual must have an itchy skin condition plus three or more of the following: history of flexural involvement, a history of asthma/hay fever, a history of a generalized dry skin, onset of rash under the age of 2 years, or visible flexural dermatitis. When tested in an independent sample of 200 consecutive dermatology outpatients of all ages, this arrangement of the diagnostic criteria achieved 69% sensitivity and 96% specificity when validated against physician's diagnosis. Based on the findings of this first exercise, minor modifications in the wording of the criteria were undertaken, and these were tested on a sample of 114 consecutive children attending out-patient paediatric dermatology clinics. Overall discrimination improved, with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96%. The simplified criteria are easy to use, take under 2 min per patient to ascertain, and do not require subjects to undress. These two independent validation studies suggest that the newly proposed criteria for atopic dermatitis perform reasonably well in hospital out-patient patients. Further validation in community settings and in developing countries is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure.

              Occupational skin diseases are among the most frequent work-related diseases in industrialized countries. Good occupational skin disease statistics exist in few countries. Questionnaire studies are needed to get more data on the epidemiology of occupational skin diseases. The Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire Group has developed a new questionnaire tool - Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002) - for surveys on work-related skin disease and exposures to environmental factors. The 2 NOSQ-2002 questionnaires have been compiled by using existing questionnaires and experience. NOSQ-2002/SHORT is a ready-to-use 4-page questionnaire for screening and monitoring occupational skin diseases, e.g. in a population or workplace. All the questions in the short questionnaire (NOSQ-2002/SHORT) are included in the long version, NOSQ-2002/LONG, which contains a pool of questions to be chosen according to research needs and tailored to specific populations. The NOSQ-2002 report includes, in addition to the questionnaires, a comprehensive manual for researchers on planning and conducting a questionnaire survey on hand eczema and relevant exposures. NOSQ-2002 questionnaires have been compiled in English and translated into Danish, Swedish, Finnish and Icelandic. The use of NOSQ-2002 will benefit research on occupational skin diseases by providing more standardized data, which can be compared between studies and countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yasemin.topal.yueksel@regionh.dk
                Journal
                Contact Dermatitis
                Contact Dermatitis
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0536
                COD
                Contact Dermatitis
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                0105-1873
                1600-0536
                21 July 2022
                December 2022
                : 87
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/cod.v87.6 )
                : 528-534
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Dermatology Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
                [ 2 ] Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Yasemin Topal Yüksel, Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark.

                Email: yasemin.topal.yueksel@ 123456regionh.dk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-1827
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3702-1409
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8299
                Article
                COD14183
                10.1111/cod.14183
                9796092
                35808939
                a69e1acf-cd6f-47d1-a0bb-101fd0328c55
                © 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 01 July 2022
                : 22 May 2022
                : 05 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 7, Words: 5382
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:28.12.2022

                diagnostic criteria,epidemiology,hand eczema,self‐reports

                Comments

                Comment on this article