13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use and safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implanted MRI-conditional pacing device

      abstract
      , ,
      Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
      BioMed Central
      19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
      27-30 January 2016

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background This study investigated the use and safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for several pathologies in patients with an implanted MRI conditional pacing system. Methods This was a retrospective, single center study. All patients with an MRI conditional pacemaker or Internal Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implanted in our center between June 2011 and March 2015 were enrolled. All MRI examinations performed in these patients were evaluated. For all patients, pacing thresholds, P- and R-wave amplitude, lead impedance and battery longevity were monitored during the entire follow-up. Results In total, 214 patients with an implanted MRI conditional device (mean age 65 ± 14; 64% male; 138 pacemakers; 76 ICDs) were enrolled. At the time of implant, 94% of these patients suffered from a co-morbidity that may lead to a future indication for MRI. In 24 patients (11%), 36 MRI investigations were safely performed during a mean follow-up period of 406 days (51-1353 days). The majority of the scans were performed to confirm, exclude or follow-up on neurological disease (figure 1). There were no significant changes in lead impedance or sensing threshold between the pre- and post-procedural measurements. Figure 1 Conclusions Since MRI conditional devices are not yet available for all patients, patients that have a high likelihood of requiring an MRI examination in the near future need to be selected before implantation of these devices.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
          BioMed Central (London )
          1097-6647
          1532-429X
          27 January 2016
          27 January 2016
          2016
          : 18
          Issue : Suppl 1 Issue sponsor : Publication of this supplement was funded by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
          : P199
          Affiliations
          Cardiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands
          Article
          5121
          10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-P199
          5032519
          a6ba3dd5-d07f-4010-bc88-10be8bdc113a
          © van der Graaf et al. 2016

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

          19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
          Los Angeles, CA, USA
          27-30 January 2016
          History
          Categories
          Poster Presentation
          Custom metadata
          © The Author(s) 2016

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article