60
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology

      meeting-report
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 4 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 11 , 5 , 1 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 11 , 13 , 1 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 3 , 20 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 3
      American Journal of Transplantation
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      clinical research/practice, translational research/science, kidney transplantation/nephrology, pathology/histopathology, organ transplantation in general, rejection, rejection: antibody‐mediated (ABMR), rejection: subclinical, rejection: T cell mediated (TCMR)

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The XIII Banff meeting, held in conjunction the Canadian Society of Transplantation in Vancouver, Canada, reviewed the clinical impact of updates of C4d‐negative antibody‐mediated rejection ( ABMR) from the 2013 meeting, reports from active Banff Working Groups, the relationships of donor‐specific antibody tests (anti‐ HLA and non‐ HLA) with transplant histopathology, and questions of molecular transplant diagnostics. The use of transcriptome gene sets, their resultant diagnostic classifiers, or common key genes to supplement the diagnosis and classification of rejection requires further consensus agreement and validation in biopsies. Newly introduced concepts include the i‐ IFTA score, comprising inflammation within areas of fibrosis and atrophy and acceptance of transplant arteriolopathy within the descriptions of chronic active T cell–mediated rejection ( TCMR) or chronic ABMR. The pattern of mixed TCMR and ABMR was increasingly recognized. This report also includes improved definitions of TCMR and ABMR in pancreas transplants with specification of vascular lesions and prospects for defining a vascularized composite allograft rejection classification. The goal of the Banff process is ongoing integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produce a consensus‐based reporting system that offers precise composite scores, accurate routine diagnostics, and applicability to next‐generation clinical trials.

          Abstract

          In this article, the Banff consortium presents the most updated version of the kidney, pancreas, and VCA transplant rejection classification and prospects for implementing intragraft molecular assessment. See the companion report on page 42.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence.

          We prospectively studied kidney transplants that progressed to failure after a biopsy for clinical indications, aiming to assign a cause to every failure. We followed 315 allograft recipients who underwent indication biopsies at 6 days to 32 years posttransplant. Sixty kidneys progressed to failure in the follow-up period (median 31.4 months). Failure was rare after T-cell-mediated rejection and acute kidney injury and common after antibody-mediated rejection or glomerulonephritis. We developed rules for using biopsy diagnoses, HLA antibody and clinical data to explain each failure. Excluding four with missing information, 56 failures were attributed to four causes: rejection 36 (64%), glomerulonephritis 10 (18%), polyoma virus nephropathy 4 (7%) and intercurrent events 6 (11%). Every rejection loss had evidence of antibody-mediated rejection by the time of failure. Among rejection losses, 17 of 36 (47%) had been independently identified as nonadherent by attending clinicians. Nonadherence was more frequent in patients who progressed to failure (32%) versus those who survived (3%). Pure T-cell-mediated rejection, acute kidney injury, drug toxicity and unexplained progressive fibrosis were not causes of loss. This prospective cohort indicates that many actual failures after indication biopsies manifest phenotypic features of antibody-mediated or mixed rejection and also underscores the major role of nonadherence. © 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions.

            The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19-23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2-day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter-observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis ("isolated v") represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated. © Copyright 2014 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions.

              The 9th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in La Coruna, Spain on June 23-29, 2007. A total of 235 pathologists, clinicians and scientists met to address unsolved issues in transplantation and adapt the Banff schema for renal allograft rejection in response to emerging data and technologies. The outcome of the consensus discussions on renal pathology is provided in this article. Major updates from the 2007 Banff Conference were: inclusion of peritubular capillaritis grading, C4d scoring, interpretation of C4d deposition without morphological evidence of active rejection, application of the Banff criteria to zero-time and protocol biopsies and introduction of a new scoring for total interstitial inflammation (ti-score). In addition, emerging research data led to the establishment of collaborative working groups addressing issues like isolated 'v' lesion and incorporation of omics-technologies, paving the way for future combination of graft biopsy and molecular parameters within the Banff process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alexandreloupy@gmail.com
                Journal
                Am J Transplant
                Am. J. Transplant
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-6143
                AJT
                American Journal of Transplantation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1600-6135
                1600-6143
                28 December 2016
                January 2017
                : 17
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/ajt.2017.17.issue-1 )
                : 28-41
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM U970 & Necker Hospital University Paris Descartes ParisFrance
                [ 2 ] Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA
                [ 3 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of Alberta EdmontonCanada
                [ 4 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
                [ 5 ] Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Hopital Saint Louis Université Paris VII and INSERM U 1160 ParisFrance
                [ 6 ] Nephrology DepartmentHospital Vall d'Hebron Autonomous University of Barcelona BarcelonaSpain
                [ 7 ] Department of Renal MedicineWestmead Hospital SydneyAustralia
                [ 8 ] Department of PathologyMassachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
                [ 9 ] Departments of Pathology & Internal MedicineUniversity of Texas Medical Branch Galveston TX
                [ 10 ] Montefiore Medical CenterAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx NY
                [ 11 ] Division of Nephrology Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
                [ 12 ] Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital of Cologne CologneGermany
                [ 13 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo Clinic Rochester MN
                [ 14 ]University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD
                [ 15 ] Berlin Institute of Health and Department of Nephrology and Critical Care MedicineCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinGermany
                [ 16 ] Department of NephrologyLeiden University Medical Center Leidenthe Netherlands
                [ 17 ] Department of PathologyUniversity of Manitoba WinnipegCanada
                [ 18 ] Department of Pathology & ImmunologyWashington University St. Louis MO
                [ 19 ] Division of Nephrology and Hypertension Department of MedicineNew York Presbyterian Hospital‐Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY
                [ 20 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill NC
                [ 21 ] Division of Transplantation PathologyThe Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA
                [ 22 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of California Los Angeles CA
                [ 23 ] Department of Cellular PathologyHammersmith Hospital London UK
                [ 24 ] Department of PathologyWeill Cornell Medicine New York NY
                [ 25 ] Division of NephrologyMayo Clinic Rochester MN
                [ 26 ] Comprehensive Transplant CenterTransplant Immunology Laboratory Northwestern University Chicago IL
                [ 27 ]University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh PA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Corresponding author: Alexandre Loupy, alexandreloupy@ 123456gmail.com
                [†]

                Both authors contributed equally.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-532X
                Article
                AJT14107
                10.1111/ajt.14107
                5363228
                27862883
                a6cb0698-2927-4cb6-9857-435b9ec46294
                © 2016 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Transplant Surgeons

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 17 July 2016
                : 25 October 2016
                : 28 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, Pages: 14, Words: 10501
                Funding
                Funded by: Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation
                Award ID: 608390948
                Funded by: Astellas
                Funded by: Alexion
                Funded by: Novartis
                Funded by: One Lambda
                Funded by: Renal Pathology Society
                Funded by: American Society of Transplantation
                Funded by: Wiley
                Funded by: Qiagen
                Funded by: Canadian Institute for Health Research
                Funded by: Immucor
                Funded by: Bridge to Life
                Funded by: Organ Recovery Systems
                Funded by: Transplant Connect
                Funded by: Glycorex Transplantation
                Funded by: Transpath Inc.
                Funded by: University of Alberta
                Categories
                Meeting Report
                Meeting Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ajt14107
                January 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:23.03.2017

                Transplantation
                clinical research/practice,translational research/science,kidney transplantation/nephrology,pathology/histopathology,organ transplantation in general,rejection,rejection: antibody‐mediated (abmr),rejection: subclinical,rejection: t cell mediated (tcmr)

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content65

                Cited by246

                Most referenced authors750