12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Providing maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal

      discussion
      a , b
      The Lancet. Global Health
      The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          By the beginning of 2020, Nepal had reached a tipping point with over 60% of births occurring in a health facility—a three times increase from just 18% in 2006. 1 This increase is testament to a range of health policies, including free maternity care, financial incentives for both antenatal care and facility-based births, and the scale-up of rural birthing centres staffed by skilled birth attendants that addressed some of the substantial geographical access constraints in the country. 2 Yet, the increase in facility-based births did not generate the expected decrease in maternal mortality, which has stagnated since the beginning of the decade. Challenges persist in providing high quality care in health facilities. 3 Consequently, both the place of births and the place of maternal deaths have shifted from homes to health facilities in Nepal. 4 In The Lancet Global Health, Ashish KC and colleagues 5 report their prospective observational study of intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes across nine referral hospitals in January to May, 2020. In their study, the authors show how fragile these coverage gains are in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. 5 National lockdown happened very early in Nepal, on March 21, 2020, well before any community spread of COVID-19. The lockdown took the form of severe restrictions on transport and closure of outpatient departments of many hospitals. 6 Even after the easing of the national lockdown on June 14, 2020, only intradistrict travel has been permitted. Hospitals were restricted in their capacity to provide routine health services while instituting COVID-19 preparedness. Across the country, fear of COVID-19 transmission in hospital settings is widespread because of a scarcity of proper protective equipment. All these factors have affected a woman's access to safe delivery, which is within their rights, by extending the delays in both reaching a health facility and in receiving quality care once she arrives. A sharp increase was seen in maternal mortality during the 2-month lockdown period between March and May, 2020, including the first COVID-19 related death in Nepal. 7 In their Article, KC and colleagues compare intrapartum care before and during the lockdown period in Nepal. 5 The number of institutional births decreased by 52·4% during the first 2 months of lockdown, and women in relatively disadvantaged ethnic groups were found to be affected more than those in more advantaged groups, indicating a widening equity gap due to COVID-19. KC and colleagues also found that quality of care in the hospitals was compromised compared with before lockdown, with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring decreasing from 57% before lockdown to 43% during lockdown and reduced levels of early initiation of breastfeeding, from 49% to 46%. Neonatal deaths increased from 13 deaths per 1000 livebirths before lockdown to 40 deaths per 1000 livebirths during lockdown, and institutional stillbirths increased from 14 per 1000 total births before lockdown to 21 per 1000 total births during lockdown. These increases are indicative of either very late arrival at a health facility or reduced quality of care, or both. Health service delivery is constrained in many low-income countries, and providing essential health services while resources are scare is a challenge. Yet, KC and colleagues also point to some positive changes that were observed, including improved hygiene practices among health-care workers. The focus on hand hygiene in health facilities could lead to sustainable improvements in maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially because sepsis is an important cause of death in this country. 8 Regenerating trust in health services requires addressing the fear of infection through providing adequate protection for health workers, women and their companions, and resolving transport challenges by establishing measures to enable women to access referral-level hospital care. The Nepalese Government should take note of this Article, monitor real-time essential services coverage levels, and be prepared to modify restrictions to enable women to again access timely and quality maternal health services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study

          Summary Background The COVID-19 pandemic response is affecting maternal and neonatal health services all over the world. We aimed to assess the number of institutional births, their outcomes (institutional stillbirth and neonatal mortality rate), and quality of intrapartum care before and during the national COVID-19 lockdown in Nepal. Methods In this prospective observational study, we collected participant-level data for pregnant women enrolled in the SUSTAIN and REFINE studies between Jan 1 and May 30, 2020, from nine hospitals in Nepal. This period included 12·5 weeks before the national lockdown and 9·5 weeks during the lockdown. Women were eligible for inclusion if they had a gestational age of 22 weeks or more, a fetal heart sound at time of admission, and consented to inclusion. Women who had multiple births and their babies were excluded. We collected information on demographic and obstetric characteristics via extraction from case notes and health worker performance via direct observation by independent clinical researchers. We used regression analyses to assess changes in the number of institutional births, quality of care, and mortality before lockdown versus during lockdown. Findings Of 22 907 eligible women, 21 763 women were enrolled and 20 354 gave birth, and health worker performance was recorded for 10 543 births. From the beginning to the end of the study period, the mean weekly number of births decreased from 1261·1 births (SE 66·1) before lockdown to 651·4 births (49·9) during lockdown—a reduction of 52·4%. The institutional stillbirth rate increased from 14 per 1000 total births before lockdown to 21 per 1000 total births during lockdown (p=0·0002), and institutional neonatal mortality increased from 13 per 1000 livebirths to 40 per 1000 livebirths (p=0·0022). In terms of quality of care, intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring decreased by 13·4% (−15·4 to −11·3; p<0·0001), and breastfeeding within 1 h of birth decreased by 3·5% (−4·6 to −2·6; p=0·0032). The immediate newborn care practice of placing the baby skin-to-skin with their mother increased by 13·2% (12·1 to 14·5; p<0·0001), and health workers' hand hygiene practices during childbirth increased by 12·9% (11·8 to 13·9) during lockdown (p<0·0001). Interpretation Institutional childbirth reduced by more than half during lockdown, with increases in institutional stillbirth rate and neonatal mortality, and decreases in quality of care. Some behaviours improved, notably hand hygiene and keeping the baby skin-to-skin with their mother. An urgent need exists to protect access to high quality intrapartum care and prevent excess deaths for the most vulnerable health system users during this pandemic period. Funding Grand Challenges Canada.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Frequency and management of maternal infection in health facilities in 52 countries (GLOSS): a 1-week inception cohort study

            Summary Background Maternal infections are an important cause of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity. We report the main findings of the WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study, which aimed to assess the frequency of maternal infections in health facilities, according to maternal characteristics and outcomes, and coverage of core practices for early identification and management. Methods We did a facility-based, prospective, 1-week inception cohort study in 713 health facilities providing obstetric, midwifery, or abortion care, or where women could be admitted because of complications of pregnancy, childbirth, post-partum, or post-abortion, in 52 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). We obtained data from hospital records for all pregnant or recently pregnant women hospitalised with suspected or confirmed infection. We calculated ratios of infection and infection-related severe maternal outcomes (ie, death or near-miss) per 1000 livebirths and the proportion of intrahospital fatalities across country income groups, as well as the distribution of demographic, obstetric, clinical characteristics and outcomes, and coverage of a set of core practices for identification and management across infection severity groups. Findings Between Nov 28, 2017, and Dec 4, 2017, of 2965 women assessed for eligibility, 2850 pregnant or recently pregnant women with suspected or confirmed infection were included. 70·4 (95% CI 67·7–73·1) hospitalised women per 1000 livebirths had a maternal infection, and 10·9 (9·8–12·0) women per 1000 livebirths presented with infection-related (underlying or contributing cause) severe maternal outcomes. Highest ratios were observed in LMICs and the lowest in HICs. The proportion of intrahospital fatalities was 6·8% among women with severe maternal outcomes, with the highest proportion in low-income countries. Infection-related maternal deaths represented more than half of the intrahospital deaths. Around two-thirds (63·9%, n=1821) of the women had a complete set of vital signs recorded, or received antimicrobials the day of suspicion or diagnosis of the infection (70·2%, n=1875), without marked differences across severity groups. Interpretation The frequency of maternal infections requiring management in health facilities is high. Our results suggest that contribution of direct (obstetric) and indirect (non-obstetric) infections to overall maternal deaths is greater than previously thought. Improvement of early identification is urgently needed, as well as prompt management of women with infections in health facilities by implementing effective evidence-based practices. Funding UNDP–UNFPA–UNICEF–WHO–World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, WHO, Merck for Mothers, and United States Agency for International Development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Assessment of facility and health worker readiness to provide quality antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care in rural Southern Nepal

              Background Increased coverage of antenatal care and facility births might not improve maternal and newborn health outcomes if quality of care is sub-optimal. Our study aimed to assess the facility readiness and health worker knowledge required to provide quality maternal and newborn care. Methods Using an audit tool and interviews, respectively, facility readiness and health providers’ knowledge of maternal and immediate newborn care were assessed at all 23 birthing centers (BCs) and the District hospital in the rural southern Nepal district of Sarlahi. Facility readiness to perform specific functions was assessed through descriptive analysis and comparisons by facility type (health post (HP), primary health care center (PHCC), private and District hospital). Knowledge was compared by facility type and by additional skilled birth attendant (SBA) training. Results Infection prevention items were lacking in more than one quarter of facilities, and widespread shortages of iron/folic acid tablets, injectable ampicillin/gentamicin, and magnesium sulfate were a major barrier to facility readiness. While parenteral oxytocin was commonly provided, only the District hospital was prepared to perform all seven basic emergency obstetric and newborn care signal functions. The required number of medical doctors, nurses and midwives were present in only 1 of 5 PHCCs. Private sector SBAs had significantly lower knowledge of active management of third stage of labor and correct diagnosis of severe pre-eclampsia. While half of the health workers had received the mandated additional two-month SBA training, comparison with the non-trained group showed no significant difference in knowledge indicators. Conclusions Facility readiness to provide quality maternal and newborn care is low in this rural area of Nepal. Addressing the gaps by facility type through regular monitoring, improving staffing and supply chains, supervision and refresher trainings is important to improve quality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Glob Health
                Lancet Glob Health
                The Lancet. Global Health
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                2214-109X
                10 August 2020
                10 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, 56700, Nepal
                [b ]Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                Article
                S2214-109X(20)30350-8
                10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30350-8
                7417156
                32791116
                a6ebbc6b-76be-4c12-a524-da61ff8fc0ba
                © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article