18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health‐Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Therapy in HR+, HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          MONARCH 3, a phase III trial (NCT02246621) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously demonstrated significantly improved progression‐free survival in patients receiving abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This study evaluated patient‐reported outcomes, including global health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms.

          Methods

          Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily; n = 328) or placebo ( n = 165), plus 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast Cancer–Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire HRQoL instruments were administered at baseline, every two cycles during cycles 2 through 19 (each cycle being 28 days), every three cycles thereafter, and once at a short‐term posttherapy follow‐up visit (approximately 30 days after discontinuation). Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD), respectively.

          Results

          Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. Although select scores statistically favored the placebo arm, global HRQoL, most symptoms, and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm with statistically and clinically meaningful differences. There were no TTSD differences between treatment arms for global HRQoL, most symptoms (except diarrhea), or functioning.

          Conclusion

          Over a 2‐year period, there were no clinically meaningful differences in global HRQoL, functioning, and most symptoms for patients receiving abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm, consistent with prior safety data, which has been shown to be manageable and reversible. Combined with clinical efficacy, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC.

          Implications for Practice

          The addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) was not associated with a clinically meaningful detriment in patient‐reported global health‐related quality of life, functioning, and most symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Prior studies have also demonstrated clinical efficacy of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone, including improved progression‐free survival and objective response rate. These results also complement previously reported toxicity data, as measured by investigator‐assessed adverse events. Taken together, these results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC.

          Abstract

          Previous reports have detailed the efficacy and toxicity of abemaciclib, but results detailing patient‐reported health‐related quality of life have not yet been published. This report assesses the effect of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with placebo plus NSAI on patient‐reported global health‐related quality of life, functioning, and symptoms in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the phase III MONARCH 3 trial.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

          To determine the significance to patients of changes in health-related quality-of-life (HLQ) scores assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). A subjective significance questionnaire (SSQ), which asks patients about perceived changes in physical, emotional, and social functioning and in global quality of life (global QL) and the QLQ-C30 were completed by patients who received chemotherapy for either breast cancer or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In the SSQ, patients rated their perception of change since the last time they completed the QLQ-C30 using a 7-category scale that ranged from "much worse" through "no change" to "much better." For each category of change in the SSQ, the corresponding differences were calculated in QLQ-C30 mean scores and effect sizes were determined. For patients who indicated "no change" in the SSQ, the mean change in scores in the corresponding QLQ-C30 domains was not significantly different from 0. For patients who indicated "a little" change either for better or for worse, the mean change in scores was about 5 to 10; for "moderate" change, about 10 to 20; and for "very much" change, greater than 20. Effect sizes increased in concordance with increasing changes in SSQ ratings and QLQ-C30 scores. The significance of changes in QLQ-C30 scores can be interpreted in terms of small, moderate, or large changes in quality of life as reported by patients in the SSQ. The magnitude of these changes also can be used to calculate the sample sizes required to detect a specified change in clinical trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib, an Inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for Patients with Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Other Solid Tumors.

            We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic effects, and antitumor activity of abemaciclib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6, in a multicenter study including phase I dose escalation followed by tumor-specific cohorts for breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), glioblastoma, melanoma, and colorectal cancer. A total of 225 patients were enrolled: 33 in dose escalation and 192 in tumor-specific cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg every 12 hours. The most common possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events involved fatigue and the gastrointestinal, renal, or hematopoietic systems. Plasma concentrations increased with dose, and pharmacodynamic effects were observed in proliferating keratinocytes and tumors. Radiographic responses were achieved in previously treated patients with breast cancer, NSCLC, and melanoma. For hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the overall response rate was 31%; moreover, 61% of patients achieved either response or stable disease lasting ≥6 months.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial

              In treating HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer, novel agents that enhance endocrine therapy activity but do not worsen quality of life (QoL) are clinically desired. Patient-reported outcomes data from the PALOMA-3 study suggest palbociclib plus fulvestrant allow patients to maintain good QoL in the endocrine resistance setting while experiencing a substantially delayed disease progression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                goetz.matthew@mayo.edu
                Journal
                Oncologist
                Oncologist
                10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
                ONCO
                theoncologist
                The Oncologist
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1083-7159
                1549-490X
                24 June 2020
                September 2020
                : 25
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v25.9 )
                : e1346-e1354
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
                [ 2 ] Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Ciberonc, Geicam, Universidad Complutense Madrid Spain
                [ 3 ] National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center Fukuoka Japan
                [ 4 ] National Cancer Center Gyeonggi‐Do Republic of South Korea
                [ 5 ] Breast Center, Universitätsklinikum Ulm Ulm Germany
                [ 6 ] Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
                [ 7 ] Eli Lilly & Co. Bad Homburg Germany
                [ 8 ] Eli Lilly & Co. Paris France
                [ 9 ] Eli Lilly & Co. Indianapolis Indiana USA
                [ 10 ] The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Matthew P. Goetz, M.D., Mayo Clinic, Division of Medical Oncology, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Telephone: 507‐284‐3731; e‐mail: goetz.matthew@ 123456mayo.edu
                Article
                ONCO13414
                10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0084
                7485333
                32536013
                a7003df2-481d-423e-89dc-b18ae76712fe
                © 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 04 February 2020
                : 21 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 9, Words: 6398
                Funding
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100004312;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                3
                Breast Cancer
                Breast Cancer
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.0 mode:remove_FC converted:11.09.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                abemaciclib,advanced breast cancer,cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor,health‐related quality of life,patient‐reported outcomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article