0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Upper Eyelid Necrosis Secondary to Hordeolum: A Case Report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We reported a case of upper eyelid necrosis initially misdiagnosed as a preseptal cellulitis following a hordeolum externum resulting in great damage to the upper eyelid (anterior lamella). The infection was successfully treated with surgical cleansing, drainage, and endovenous antibiotics. Early treatment may avoid severe complications such as eyelid deformity, systemic involvement, and blindness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The pathogenesis of orbital complications in acute sinusitis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical practice guideline: management of sinusitis.

              (2001)
            This clinical practice guideline formulates recommendations for health care providers regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of children, ages 1 to 21 years, with uncomplicated acute, subacute, and recurrent acute bacterial sinusitis. It was developed through a comprehensive search and analysis of the medical literature. Expert consensus opinion was used to enhance or formulate recommendations where data were insufficient. A subcommittee, composed of pediatricians with expertise in infectious disease, allergy, epidemiology, family practice, and pediatric practice, supplemented with an otolaryngologist and radiologist, were selected to formulate the practice parameter. Several other groups (including members of the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology, as well as numerous national committees and sections of the American Academy of Pediatrics) have reviewed and revised the guideline. Three specific issues were considered: 1) evidence for the efficacy of various antibiotics in children; 2) evidence for the efficacy of various ancillary, nonantibiotic regimens; and 3) the diagnostic accuracy and concordance of clinical symptoms, radiography (and other imaging methods), and sinus aspiration. It is recommended that the diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis be based on clinical criteria in children 6 years of age. Computed tomography scans of the paranasal sinuses should be reserved for children who present with complications of acute bacterial sinusitis or who have very persistent or recurrent infections and are not responsive to medical management. There were only 5 controlled randomized trials and 8 case series on antimicrobial therapy for acute bacterial sinusitis in children. However, these data, plus data derived from the study of adults with acute bacterial sinusitis, support the recommendation that acute bacterial sinusitis be treated with antimicrobial therapy to achieve a more rapid clinical cure. Children with complications or suspected complications of acute bacterial sinusitis should be treated promptly and aggressively with antibiotics and, when appropriate, drainage. Based on controversial and limited data, no recommendations are made about the use of prophylactic antimicrobials, ancillary therapies, or complementary/alternative medicine for prevention and treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial sinusitis in children. It is designed to assist pediatricians by providing an analytic framework for evaluation and treatment. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all patients with this condition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis.

              Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressing skin infection characterized by necrosis of the fascia and subcutaneous tissue, accompanied by severe systemic toxicity. The objective of this systematic review was to identify clinical features and investigations that will aid early diagnosis. A systematic literature search of PubMed was undertaken using the keywords 'necrotising fasciitis', 'necrotising skin infection', 'diagnosis' and 'outcome'. Case series of 50 or more subjects with information on symptoms and signs at initial presentation, investigations and clinical outcome were included. Nine case series were selected, with a total of 1463 patients. Diabetes mellitus was a co-morbidity in 44.5 per cent of patients. Contact with marine life or ingestion of seafood in patients with liver disease were risk factors in some parts of Asia. The top three early presenting clinical features were: swelling (80.8 per cent), pain (79.0 per cent) and erythema (70.7 per cent). These being non-specific features, initial misdiagnosis was common and occurred in almost three-quarters of patients. Clinical features that helped early diagnosis were: pain out of proportion to the physical findings; failure to improve despite broad-spectrum antibiotics; presence of bullae in the skin; and gas in the soft tissue on plain X-ray (although this occurred in only 24.8 per cent of patients). A high index of suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis is needed in a patient presenting with cutaneous infection causing swelling, pain and erythema, with co-morbidity of diabetes or liver disease. The presence of bullae, or gas on plain X-ray can be diagnostic. Early surgical exploration is the best approach in the uncertain case. © 2013 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Rep Ophthalmol
                Case Rep Ophthalmol
                COP
                Case Reports in Ophthalmology
                S. Karger AG (Allschwilerstrasse 10, P.O. Box · Postfach · Case postale, CH–4009, Basel, Switzerland · Schweiz · Suisse, Phone: +41 61 306 11 11, Fax: +41 61 306 12 34, karger@karger.com )
                1663-2699
                Jan-Apr 2021
                19 April 2021
                19 April 2021
                : 12
                : 1
                : 270-276
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                bDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Institute of Childcare and Pediatrics Martagão Gesteira-Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPPMG-UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                cUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                dCentro de Estudos Alcides Hirai, Ver Mais Oftalmologia, São Paulo, Brazil
                eVera Cruz Oftalmologia, Campinas, Brazil
                fFundação Roberto Rocha Brito, Hospital Vera Cruz, Campinas, Brazil
                Article
                cop-0012-0270
                10.1159/000513958
                8138243
                34054469
                Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.

                Page count
                Figures: 5, References: 40, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Case Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article