12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hydrogeochemical controls on brook trout spawning habitats in a coastal stream

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) spawn in fall and overwintering egg development can benefit from stable, relatively warm temperatures in groundwater-seepage zones. However, eggs are also sensitive to dissolved oxygen concentration, which may be reduced in discharging groundwater (i.e., seepage). We investigated a 2 km reach of the coastal Quashnet River in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA, to relate preferred fish spawning habitats to geology, geomorphology, and discharging groundwater geochemistry. Thermal reconnaissance methods were used to locate zones of rapid groundwater discharge, which were predominantly found along the central channel of a wider stream valley section. Pore-water chemistry and temporal vertical groundwater flux were measured at a subset of these zones during field campaigns over several seasons. Seepage zones in open-valley sub-reaches generally showed suboxic conditions and higher dissolved solutes compared to the underlying glacial outwash aquifer. These discharge zones were cross-referenced with preferred brook trout redds and evaluated during 10 years of observation, all of which were associated with discrete alcove features in steep cutbanks, where stream meander bends intersect the glacial valley walls. Seepage in these repeat spawning zones was generally stronger and more variable than in open-valley sites, with higher dissolved oxygen and reduced solute concentrations. The combined evidence indicates that regional groundwater discharge along the broader valley bottom is predominantly suboxic due to the influence of near-stream organic deposits; trout show no obvious preference for these zones when spawning. However, the meander bends that cut into sandy deposits near the valley walls generate strong oxic seepage zones that are utilized routinely for redd construction and the overwintering of trout eggs. Stable water isotopic data support the conclusion that repeat spawning zones are located directly on preferential discharges of more localized groundwater. In similar coastal systems with extensive valley peat deposits, the specific use of groundwater-discharge points by brook trout may be limited to morphologies such as cutbanks, where groundwater flow paths do not encounter substantial buried organic material and remain oxygen-rich.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stable isotopes in precipitation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis.

            Denitrification is a critical process regulating the removal of bioavailable nitrogen (N) from natural and human-altered systems. While it has been extensively studied in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems, there has been limited communication among denitrification scientists working in these individual systems. Here, we compare rates of denitrification and controlling factors across a range of ecosystem types. We suggest that terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems in which denitrification occurs can be organized along a continuum ranging from (1) those in which nitrification and denitrification are tightly coupled in space and time to (2) those in which nitrate production and denitrification are relatively decoupled. In aquatic ecosystems, N inputs influence denitrification rates whereas hydrology and geomorphology influence the proportion of N inputs that are denitrified. Relationships between denitrification and water residence time and N load are remarkably similar across lakes, river reaches, estuaries, and continental shelves. Spatially distributed global models of denitrification suggest that continental shelf sediments account for the largest portion (44%) of total global denitrification, followed by terrestrial soils (22%) and oceanic oxygen minimum zones (OMZs; 14%). Freshwater systems (groundwater, lakes, rivers) account for about 20% and estuaries 1% of total global denitrification. Denitrification of land-based N sources is distributed somewhat differently. Within watersheds, the amount of land-based N denitrified is generally highest in terrestrial soils, with progressively smaller amounts denitrified in groundwater, rivers, lakes and reservoirs, and estuaries. A number of regional exceptions to this general trend of decreasing denitrification in a downstream direction exist, including significant denitrification in continental shelves of N from terrestrial sources. Though terrestrial soils and groundwater are responsible for much denitrification at the watershed scale, per-area denitrification rates in soils and groundwater (kg N x km(-2) x yr(-1)) are, on average, approximately one-tenth the per-area rates of denitrification in lakes, rivers, estuaries, continental shelves, or OMZs. A number of potential approaches to increase denitrification on the landscape, and thus decrease N export to sensitive coastal systems exist. However, these have not generally been widely tested for their effectiveness at scales required to significantly reduce N export at the whole watershed scale.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring methods for groundwater – surface water interactions: a review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101717742
                47099
                Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
                Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
                Hydrology and earth system sciences
                1027-5606
                1607-7938
                29 April 2019
                2018
                14 May 2019
                : 22
                : 12
                : 6383-6398
                Affiliations
                [1 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrogeophysics Branch, 11 Sherman Place, Unit 5015, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
                [2 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Water Cycle Branch, M.S. 430, Reston, VA 20192, USA
                [3 ]Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, 195 Bournedale Road, Buzzards Bay, MA 02532, USA
                [4 ]U.S. Geological Survey, National Research Program, M.S. 406, Bldg. 25, DFC, Lakewood, CO 80225, USA
                [5 ]U.S. Geological Survey, 10 Bearfoot Road, Northborough, MA 01532, USA
                [6 ]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Exposure Methods & Measurement Division, Environmental Chemistry Branch, Las Vegas, NV 89119 USA
                Author notes

                Author contributions. All authors contributed to the analysis of field data and the development of this paper.

                Correspondence: Martin A. Briggs ( mbriggs@ 123456usgs.gov )
                Article
                EPAPA1022817
                10.5194/hess-22-6383-2018
                6516499
                a747d3c8-6738-4bc0-805b-6fd9192cc1a0

                This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article