6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patients with non-operated traumatic primary or recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation have equally poor self-reported and measured shoulder function: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with non-operated traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation (PASD) are assumed to have less shoulder impairment than patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations (RASD). This may impact treatment decision strategy. The aim was to study whether patients with non-operated traumatic PASD have less shoulder impairment than those with RASD.

          Methods

          In a cross-sectional study baseline data from patients with PASD and RASD in a randomised controlled trial of non-operative shoulder exercise treatment were used. Shoulder function was self-reported (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), General Health (EQ-5D-VAS), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)), and measured (Constant-Murley shoulder Score (CMS total), CMS - Range of Motion (CMS-ROM, CMS – strength, proprioception, clinical tests).

          Results

          In total, 56 patients (34 (28 men) with PASD and 22 (21 men) with RASD) (mean age 26 years) participated. WOSI total was 1064 and 1048, and TSK above 37 (indicating high re-injury fear) was present in 33 (97%) and 21 (96%) of the groups with PASD and RASD, with no group difference. CMS total (66.4 and 70.4), CMS-ROM (28.7 and 31.5), CMS-strength (injured shoulder: 7.6 kg and 9.1 kg), proprioception and clinical tests were the same. Furthermore, 26 (76%) with PASD and 13 (59%) with RASD reported not to have received non-operative shoulder treatment.

          Conclusions

          Non-operated patients with PASD and self-reported shoulder trouble three-six weeks after initial injury do not have less shoulder impairment (self-reportedly or objectively measured) than non-operated patients RASD and self-reported shoulder trouble three-six weeks after their latest shoulder dislocation event.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

          Two studies are presented that investigated 'fear of movement/(re)injury' in chronic musculoskeletal pain and its relation to behavioral performance. The 1st study examines the relation among fear of movement/(re)injury (as measured with the Dutch version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-DV)) (Kori et al. 1990), biographical variables (age, pain duration, gender, use of supportive equipment, compensation status), pain-related variables (pain intensity, pain cognitions, pain coping) and affective distress (fear and depression) in a group of 103 chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. In the 2nd study, motoric, psychophysiologic and self-report measures of fear are taken from 33 CLBP patients who are exposed to a single and relatively simple movement. Generally, findings demonstrated that the fear of movement/(re)injury is related to gender and compensation status, and more closely to measures of catastrophizing and depression, but in a much lesser degree to pain coping and pain intensity. Furthermore, subjects who report a high degree of fear of movement/(re)injury show more fear and escape/avoidance when exposed to a simple movement. The discussion focuses on the clinical relevance of the construct of fear of movement/(re)injury and research questions that remain to be answered.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain.

            To examine the psychometric properties of the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in patients with shoulder pain. Single-group repeated measures design in which 101 patients presenting to physical therapy completed the QuickDASH and the NPRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up visit. At the follow-up all patients also completed the Global Rating of Change (GRC), which was used to dichotomize patients as improved or stable. Baseline and follow-up scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity and minimal levels of detectable and clinically important change for both the QuickDASH and NPRS. Test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the QuickDASH and 0.74 for the NPRS. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 8.0 points for the QuickDASH and 1.1 for the NPRS. The NPRS and QuickDASH exhibit good test-retest reliability and responsiveness in patients with shoulder pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

              The purpose of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, and responsive disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with shoulder instability. Development included 1) identification of a specific patient population; 2) generation of issues specific to the "disease" ("items") from reviewing the literature, interviewing health caregivers, and interviewing patients representing all demographics, disease type and severity, and treatments; 3) item reduction using patient-generated frequency-importance products and correlation matrices; and 4) pretesting the prototype instrument on 2 groups of 10 patients. The final instrument, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, has 21 items representing 4 domains. The instrument attributes (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) were evaluated. Construct validation demonstrated that this index correlated predictably with other measures. Reliability was very high at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the index was more responsive (sensitive to change) than five other shoulder measurement tools (the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale; The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; the UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale; the Constant Score; and the Rowe Rating Scale), a global health instrument (the SF12), and range of motion. Since the patient's perception of changes in health status is the most important indicator of the success of a treatment, we suggest that this measurement tool be used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate treatments in this patient population, although it can also be used for monitoring patients' progress in clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +45 2942 3335 , Henrikeshoj@gmail.com
                sten.rasmussen@rn.dk
                lars.henrik.frich@rsyd.dk
                steen.lund.jensen@rn.dk
                ksogaard@health.sdu.dk
                bjuul-kristensen@health.sdu.dk
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                8 February 2019
                8 February 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, GRID grid.7143.1, Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Hematology, , Odense University Hospital, ; J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0646 7349, GRID grid.27530.33, Orthopaedic Research Unit, , Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, ; Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0742 471X, GRID grid.5117.2, Department of Clinical Medicine, , Aalborg University, ; Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, GRID grid.7143.1, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, , Odense University Hospital, ; J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, GRID grid.10825.3e, Department of Clinical Research, , University of Southern Denmark, ; Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0646 7349, GRID grid.27530.33, Shoulder sector, Orthopaedic Department, , Aalborg University Hospital, ; Farsoe, Denmark
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, GRID grid.10825.3e, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, , University of Southern, ; Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-7197
                Article
                2444
                10.1186/s12891-019-2444-0
                6368725
                30736761
                a7515e2e-a236-49b2-b1d7-10e4985f05dc
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 18 December 2017
                : 30 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008368, Gigtforeningen;
                Award ID: R114-A2679
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Region of Southern Denmark Research Fund
                Award ID: 13/6925
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006304, Aalborg Universitetshospital;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Orthopedics
                shoulder dislocation, shoulder instability,re-injury,proprioception,range of movement,strength,kinesiophobia,quality of life,males

                Comments

                Comment on this article