16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      1627
      Diagnostic Accuracy of Loop-Mediated Isothermal DNA Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI): a Meta-Analysis

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background.  Nucleic acid amplification tests including real-time polymerase chain reaction and loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) are currently used as standalone diagnostic tests of C. difficileinfection (CDI) in the United States. These assays are reported to have similar sensitivity and specificity to toxigenic culture. The aim of this meta-analysis study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LAMP in detecting CDI. Methods.  We searched MEDLINE and 4 other databases to identify diagnostic accuracy studies that compared LAMP with cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCCNA) or anaerobic toxigenic culture (TC) of C. difficilefrom database inception to 2013. Screening for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out independently by 2 investigators and disagreements resolved. Data in the tables, figures, or text were independently extracted by 2 authors. We used the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) random effects model to calculate summary receiver operating characteristic curves, diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% CIs. Results.  A search of the databases yielded 16 studies (6,798 samples) that met the inclusion criteria. When TC was used as the gold standard (n= 14), the pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96; I 2 = 37.7); specificity, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98; I 2 = 94); and diagnostic odds ratio, 1180 (95% CI, 537-2592; I 2 = 62.2). With CCCNA as a gold standard (n = 3), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95; I 2 = 64.8); specificity, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97; I 2 = 94.8); and diagnostic odds ratio, 346 (95% CI, 95-1255; I 2 = 0). Conclusion.  LAMP appears to have high diagnostic accuracy for identifying CDI. Although there was high heterogeneity among the studies, this meta-analysis suggests that LAMP is a useful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting CDI. Disclosures.   All authors: No reported disclosures.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          ofids
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press
          2328-8957
          December 2014
          December 2014
          : 1
          : Suppl 1 , IDWeek 2014 Abstracts
          : S434-S435
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
          [2 ]Infectious Disease, Case Western Reserve Medical School, Cleveland, OH
          [3 ]Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
          [4 ]Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [5 ]Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
          [6 ]Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [7 ]Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
          [8 ]Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
          Author notes

          Session: 203. Clostridium difficile Infection: Epidemiology, Presentation, Treatment

          Saturday, October 11, 2014: 12:30 PM

          Article
          ofu052
          10.1093/ofid/ofu052.1173
          5781961
          a766a3a5-556c-404a-b223-4f990c7cebc7
          © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
          History
          Categories
          IDWeek 2014 Abstracts
          Poster Abstracts

          Comments

          Comment on this article